Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Neurology. 2010 Jan 12;74(2):173-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918fc. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
To determine if transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) is efficacious in the treatment of pain in neurologic disorders.
We performed a systematic literature search of Medline and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2009.
There are conflicting reports of TENS compared to sham TENS in the treatment of chronic low back pain, with 2 Class II studies showing benefit, but 2 Class I studies and another Class II study not showing benefit. Because the Class I studies are stronger evidence, TENS is established as ineffective for the treatment of chronic low back pain (2 Class I studies). TENS is probably effective in treating painful diabetic neuropathy (2 Class II studies).
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) is not recommended for the treatment of chronic low back pain (Level A). TENS should be considered in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (Level B). Further research into the mechanism of action of TENS is needed, as well as more rigorous studies for determination of efficacy.
确定经皮电神经刺激(TENS)在治疗神经疾病疼痛中的疗效。
我们对 Medline 和 Cochrane Library 进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间从建库至 2009 年 4 月。
与假 TENS 相比,TENS 在治疗慢性下腰痛方面的疗效存在争议,2 项 II 级研究显示有效,但 2 项 I 级研究和另一项 II 级研究未显示有效。由于 I 级研究的证据更强,TENS 被确定为治疗慢性下腰痛无效(2 项 I 级研究)。TENS 可能对治疗痛性糖尿病性神经病变有效(2 项 II 级研究)。
不推荐 TENS 治疗慢性下腰痛(A级)。应考虑 TENS 治疗痛性糖尿病性神经病变(B 级)。需要进一步研究 TENS 的作用机制,并开展更严格的疗效研究。