Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health Group, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Sep;141(9):1905-19. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002403. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
A randomized control trial on verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC)-infected farms found evidence that: (1) keeping animals in the same group; (2) maintaining dry bedding; (3) preventing direct contact with neighbouring cattle; and (4) maintaining a closed herd, were associated with a reduced risk of infection in youngstock aged 3–18 months. This study evaluated these interventions using a cost-effectiveness framework for UK dairy farms. Keeping animals in the same group was considered to have negligible cost and was feasible for herds containing over 77 dairy cows. Assuming equal efficacy of the remaining interventions, preventing direct contact between neighbouring cattle is most cost-effective with a median annual cost of £2.76 per cow. This compares to £4.18 for maintaining dry bedding and £17.42 for maintaining a closed herd using quarantine procedures. Further model validation and exploration of other potential benefits are required before making policy decisions on VTEC control.
一项针对产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(VTEC)感染农场的随机对照试验发现证据表明:(1)将动物饲养在同一群体中;(2)保持干燥的垫料;(3)防止与邻近牛直接接触;以及(4)保持封闭牛群,与 3-18 个月大的幼畜感染风险降低有关。本研究使用英国奶牛场的成本效益框架评估了这些干预措施。将动物饲养在同一群体中被认为成本可以忽略不计,并且对于包含超过 77 头奶牛的牛群是可行的。假设其余干预措施具有同等功效,那么防止邻近牛之间的直接接触是最具成本效益的,每头牛的年均成本为 2.76 英镑。相比之下,保持干燥垫料的成本为 4.18 英镑,而使用检疫程序保持封闭牛群的成本为 17.42 英镑。在就 VTEC 控制做出政策决定之前,需要进一步验证模型并探索其他潜在效益。