Cox Georgina R, Fisher Caroline A, De Silva Stefanie, Phelan Mark, Akinwale Olaoluwa P, Simmons Magenta B, Hetrick Sarah E
Orygen YouthHealth ResearchCentre,Centre for YouthMentalHealth,University ofMelbourne,Melbourne, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD007504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007504.pub2.
Depressive disorders often begin during childhood or adolescence. There is a growing body of evidence supporting effective treatments during the acute phase of a depressive disorder. However, little is known about treatments for preventing relapse or recurrence of depression once an individual has achieved remission or recovery from their symptoms.
To determine the efficacy of early interventions, including psychological and pharmacological interventions, to prevent relapse or recurrence of depressive disorders in children and adolescents.
We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR) (to 1 June 2011). The CCDANCTR contains reports of relevant randomised controlled trials from The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). In addition we handsearched the references of all included studies and review articles.
Randomised controlled trials using a psychological or pharmacological intervention, with the aim of preventing relapse or recurrence from an episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymic disorder (DD) in children and adolescents were included. Participants were required to have been diagnosed with MDD or DD according to DSM or ICD criteria, using a standardised and validated assessment tool.
Two review authors independently assessed all trials for inclusion in the review, extracted trial and outcome data, and assessed trial quality. Results for dichotomous outcomes are expressed as odds ratio and continuous measures as mean difference or standardised mean difference. We combined results using random-effects meta-analyses, with 95% confidence intervals. We contacted lead authors of included trials and requested additional data where possible.
Nine trials with 882 participants were included in the review. In five trials the outcome assessors were blind to the participants' intervention condition and in the remainder of trials it was unclear. In the majority of trials, participants were either not blind to their intervention condition, or it was unclear whether they were or not. Allocation concealment was also unclear in the majority of trials. Although all trials treated participants in an outpatient setting, the designs implemented in trials was diverse, which limits the generalisability of the results. Three trials indicated participants treated with antidepressant medication had lower relapse-recurrence rates (40.9%) compared to those treated with placebo (66.6%) during a relapse prevention phase (odds ratio (OR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.64, P = 0.02). One trial that compared a combination of psychological therapy and medication to medication alone favoured a combination approach over medication alone, however this result did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.06 to 1.15). The majority of trials that involved antidepressant medication reported adverse events including suicide-related behaviours. However, there were not enough data to show which treatment approach results in the most favourable adverse event profile.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is little evidence to conclude which type of treatment approach is most effective in preventing relapse or recurrence of depressive episodes in children and adolescents. Limited trials found that antidepressant medication reduces the chance of relapse-recurrence in the future, however, there is considerable diversity in the design of trials, making it difficult to compare outcomes across studies. Some of the research involving psychological therapies is encouraging, however at present more trials with larger sample sizes need to be conducted in order to explore this treatment approach further.
抑郁症常常始于儿童期或青少年期。越来越多的证据支持在抑郁症急性期进行有效治疗。然而,对于个体症状缓解或康复后预防抑郁症复发的治疗方法却知之甚少。
确定包括心理和药物干预在内的早期干预措施预防儿童和青少年抑郁症复发的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane抑郁、焦虑和神经症综述小组的专业注册库(截至2011年6月1日)。该注册库包含来自Cochrane图书馆(所有年份)、EMBASE(1974年至今)、MEDLINE(1950年至今)和PsycINFO(1967年至今)的相关随机对照试验报告。此外,我们还手工检索了所有纳入研究和综述文章的参考文献。
纳入使用心理或药物干预以预防儿童和青少年重度抑郁症(MDD)或心境恶劣障碍(DD)发作复发的随机对照试验。参与者需根据DSM或ICD标准,使用标准化和经过验证的评估工具被诊断为MDD或DD。
两位综述作者独立评估所有试验是否纳入综述,提取试验和结局数据,并评估试验质量。二分结局的结果以比值比表示,连续测量结果以均值差或标准化均值差表示。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析合并结果,并给出95%置信区间。我们联系了纳入试验的主要作者,并尽可能索要额外数据。
本综述纳入了9项试验,共882名参与者。5项试验中结局评估者对参与者的干预情况不知情,其余试验情况不明。在大多数试验中,参与者要么对自己的干预情况知情,要么不清楚他们是否知情。大多数试验中的分配隐藏情况也不明。尽管所有试验均在门诊环境中治疗参与者,但试验采用的设计各不相同,这限制了结果的普遍性。3项试验表明,在预防复发阶段,与接受安慰剂治疗的参与者(66.6%)相比,接受抗抑郁药物治疗的参与者复发率较低(40.9%)(比值比(OR)0.34;95%置信区间(CI)0.18至0.64,P = 0.02)。一项将心理治疗与药物联合治疗与单纯药物治疗进行比较的试验显示联合治疗方法优于单纯药物治疗,但该结果未达到统计学显著性(OR 0.26;95% CI 0.06至1.15)。大多数涉及抗抑郁药物的试验报告了不良事件,包括与自杀相关的行为。然而,没有足够的数据表明哪种治疗方法导致的不良事件情况最有利。
目前,几乎没有证据能确定哪种治疗方法在预防儿童和青少年抑郁发作复发方面最有效。有限的试验发现抗抑郁药物可降低未来复发的几率,然而,试验设计存在相当大的差异,使得难以在不同研究间比较结果。一些涉及心理治疗的研究令人鼓舞,但目前需要进行更多样本量更大的试验,以便进一步探索这种治疗方法。