• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of neuraxial analgesia technique on labor and maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective study.椎管内镇痛技术对分娩和母婴结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1233-1241. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06600-6. Epub 2022 May 22.
2
Effects of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on first stage of labor: a cohort study.腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛对产程第一阶段的影响:一项队列研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(21):3559-3565. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1467892. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
The effect of combined spinal epidural versus epidural analgesia on fetal heart rate in laboring patients at risk for uteroplacental insufficiency.联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉与硬膜外镇痛对有胎盘功能不全风险的分娩患者胎儿心率的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1711724. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
4
Comparison of the labor curves with and without combined spinal-epidural analgesia in nulliparous women- a retrospective study.未产妇联合腰麻-硬膜外镇痛与未联合镇痛时产程曲线的比较——一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03161-x.
5
Effect of labor analgesia on labor outcome.分娩镇痛对分娩结局的影响。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):317-22. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283385492.
6
Maternal Fever Associated With Continuous Spinal Versus Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.母亲发热与连续椎管内麻醉与硬膜外麻醉分娩镇痛相关:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Dec 1;135(6):1153-1158. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005905. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Incidence and characteristics of breakthrough pain in parturients using computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia.产妇使用计算机整合患者自控硬膜外镇痛的爆发痛发生率和特征。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
8
Comparison of the incidence of fetal prolonged deceleration after induction of labor analgesia between dural puncture epidural and combined spinal epidural technique: a pilot study.硬膜外穿刺与腰硬联合麻醉在分娩镇痛后胎儿延长减速发生率的比较:一项初步研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05473-0.
9
Nitrous Oxide During Labor: Maternal Satisfaction Does Not Depend Exclusively on Analgesic Effectiveness.分娩期间的氧化亚氮:产妇满意度并非仅取决于镇痛效果。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):548-553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001680.
10
Maternal quality of life in routine labor epidural analgesia versus labor analgesia on request: results of a randomized trial.常规分娩硬膜外镇痛与按需分娩镇痛对产妇生活质量的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2027-2033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1838-z. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia on pain and blood pressure in preeclamptic women undergoing painless delivery.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉与硬膜外镇痛对先兆子痫产妇无痛分娩时疼痛及血压的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):5679-5688. doi: 10.62347/WQTE9989. eCollection 2025.
2
Multimodal Acute Pain Management in the Parturient with Opioid Use Disorder: A Review.患有阿片类药物使用障碍的产妇的多模式急性疼痛管理:综述
J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 29;17:797-813. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S434010. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripartal pain perception and pain therapy: introduction and validation of a questionnaire as a quality instrument.围产期疼痛感知和疼痛治疗:问卷作为质量工具的介绍和验证。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;305(6):1409-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06246-w. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Neuraxial analgesia for labour.分娩时的椎管内镇痛
BJA Educ. 2020 Mar;20(3):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.11.006. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity.第一产程异常持续时间与母婴发病率的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):445.e1-445.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.053.
4
Intrapartum fetal monitoring and perinatal risk factors of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.产时胎儿监护与新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的围生期危险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):409-417. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05757-2. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Performing in-depth analysis of pain control strategies based on low concentration of local anesthetic during labor.基于低浓度局部麻醉药的分娩期疼痛控制策略的深入分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;304(1):279-280. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05720-1. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
The effects of epidural analgesia using low-concentration local anesthetic during the entire labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective group study.整个产程中使用低浓度局部麻醉药进行硬膜外镇痛对母婴结局的影响:一项前瞻性分组研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1153-1158. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05511-8. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia.罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于硬膜外麻醉和腰硬联合麻醉在分娩镇痛中的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0855-y.
8
A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.产科麻醉对母婴结局影响的综述。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):192-215. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002182.
9
The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women on Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate Tracings: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.分娩期妇女联合脊髓硬膜外阻滞与硬膜外镇痛对胎儿心率异常监护的影响:系统评价与Meta分析
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):955-64. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001412.
10
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.

椎管内镇痛技术对分娩和母婴结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。

Effects of neuraxial analgesia technique on labor and maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1233-1241. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06600-6. Epub 2022 May 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06600-6
PMID:35599249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023596/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of epidural analgesia (EA) and combined spinal epidural analgesia (SEA) on labor and maternal-fetal outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified and included 1499 patients with a single cephalic fetus who delivered at the study center from January 2015 to December 2018 and received neuraxial analgesia at the beginning of the active phase of labor (presence of regular painful contractions and cervical dilatation between 4 and 6 cm). Data including analgesia, labor characteristics, and maternal-fetal outcomes were retrieved from the prospectively collected delivery room database and medical records.

RESULTS

SEA was associated with a shorter first stage of labor than EA, with a median difference of 60 min. On multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis, neuraxial analgesia, gestational age, fetal weight, labor induction, and parity were independently associated with the first stage length: patients in the EA group were 1.32 times more likely to have a longer first stage of labor (95% CI 1.06-1.64, p = 0.012) than those in the SEA group. Additionally, a significantly lower incidence of fundal pressure was performed among patients who underwent SEA (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.9, p = 0.017). No associations were observed between the used neuraxial analgesia technique and other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SEA was associated with a shorter length of the first stage of labor and a lower rate of fundal pressure use than EA. Further studies confirming the effects of SEA on labor management and clarifying differences in maternal-fetal outcomes will allow concluding about the superiority of one technique upon the other.

摘要

目的

比较硬膜外镇痛(EA)和联合脊麻-硬膜外镇痛(SEA)对分娩和母婴结局的影响。

方法

我们回顾性地确定并纳入了 1499 名于 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在研究中心分娩且在活跃期开始时接受了脊神经轴镇痛(有规律的疼痛性宫缩和宫颈扩张 4-6cm)的单胎头胎儿患者。从前瞻性收集的分娩室数据库和病历中检索包括镇痛、分娩特征和母婴结局在内的数据。

结果

SEA 与 EA 相比,第一产程更短,中位数差异为 60 分钟。在多变量有序逻辑回归分析中,脊神经轴镇痛、胎龄、胎儿体重、引产和产次与第一产程长度独立相关:EA 组患者第一产程更长的可能性是 SEA 组的 1.32 倍(95%CI 1.06-1.64,p=0.012)。此外,SEA 组患者宫底压力的发生率明显降低(OR 0.55,95%CI 0.34-0.9,p=0.017)。使用的脊神经轴镇痛技术与其他结果之间没有关联。

结论

SEA 与 EA 相比,第一产程更短,宫底压力使用率更低。进一步的研究证实了 SEA 对分娩管理的影响,并阐明了母婴结局的差异,将有助于得出一种技术优于另一种技术的结论。