Suppr超能文献

比较商业保险覆盖的度洛西汀或普瑞巴林起始治疗纤维肌痛患者的住院和门诊就诊的常见原因。

Comparing common reasons for inpatient and outpatient visits between commercially-insured duloxetine or pregabalin initiators with fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2012;5:443-51. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S35649. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the main reasons for inpatient or outpatient visits after initiating duloxetine or pregabalin.

METHODS

Commercially insured patients with fibromyalgia and aged 18-64 years who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin in 2006 with 12-month continuous enrollment before and after initiation were identified. Duloxetine and pregabalin cohorts with similar demographics, pre-index clinical and economic characteristics, and pre-index treatment patterns were constructed via propensity scoring stratification. Reasons for inpatient admissions, physician office visits, outpatient hospital visits, emergency room visits, and primary or specialty care visits over the 12 months post-index period were examined and compared. Logistic regression was used to assess the contribution of duloxetine versus pregabalin initiation to the most common reasons for visits, controlling for cross-cohort differences.

RESULTS

Per the study design, the duloxetine (n = 3711) and pregabalin (n = 4111) cohorts had similar demographics (mean age 51 years, 83% female) and health care costs over the 12-month pre-index period. Total health care costs during the 12-month post-index period were significantly lower for duloxetine patients than for pregabalin patients ($19,378 versus $27,045, P < 0.05). Eight of the 10 most common reasons for inpatient admissions and outpatient hospital (physician office, emergency room, primary or specialty care) visits were the same for both groups. Controlling for cross-cohort differences, duloxetine patients were less likely to be hospitalized due to an intervertebral disc disorder or major depressive disorder, to have a physician office visit due to nonspecific backache/other back/neck pain (NB/OB/NP) disorder, or to go to specialty care due to a soft tissue, NB/OP/NP, or intervertebral disc disorder. However, duloxetine patients were more likely to have a primary care visit due to a soft tissue disorder, essential hypertension, or other general symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Among similar commercially insured patients with fibromyalgia who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin, duloxetine patients had significantly lower health care costs over the 12-month post-index period. The leading reasons for inpatient or outpatient visits were also somewhat different.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨起始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林后住院或门诊就诊的主要原因。

方法

本研究纳入了在 2006 年起始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林且在起始前和起始后 12 个月均连续入组的年龄在 18-64 岁之间、患有纤维肌痛且有商业保险的患者。通过倾向评分分层构建了度洛西汀和普瑞巴林队列,这些队列在人口统计学特征、索引前临床和经济特征以及索引前治疗模式方面相似。在索引后 12 个月期间,考察并比较了住院入院、医生就诊、门诊就诊、急诊就诊以及初级或专科护理就诊的原因。采用逻辑回归评估起始使用度洛西汀与起始使用普瑞巴林对就诊最常见原因的影响,同时控制了队列间差异。

结果

根据研究设计,度洛西汀(n=3711)和普瑞巴林(n=4111)队列的人口统计学特征(平均年龄 51 岁,83%为女性)和索引前 12 个月的医疗保健费用相似。索引后 12 个月期间,度洛西汀患者的总医疗保健费用显著低于普瑞巴林患者($19378 比 $27045,P<0.05)。两组患者的 10 种最常见的住院和门诊(医生就诊、急诊、初级或专科护理)就诊原因中有 8 种相同。控制了队列间差异后,度洛西汀患者因椎间盘疾病或重度抑郁症住院的可能性较小,因非特异性背痛/其他背部/颈部疼痛(NB/OB/NP)障碍就诊的可能性较小,因软组织、NB/OP/NP 或椎间盘疾病就诊的可能性较小。然而,度洛西汀患者因软组织疾病、原发性高血压或其他一般症状就诊的可能性更大。

结论

在起始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林的患有纤维肌痛的相似商业保险患者中,度洛西汀患者在索引后 12 个月的医疗保健费用显著降低。住院或门诊就诊的主要原因也略有不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7f/3496526/9fc141d5378d/jpr-5-443f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验