Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Aug;50(4):647-660. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00869-6.
Few studies have examined the incremental validity of multi-informant depression screening approaches. In response, we examined how recommendations for using a multi-informant approach may vary for identifying concurrent or prospective depressive episodes. Participants included 663 youth (Age = 11.83; Age = 2.40) and their caregiver who independently completed youth depression questionnaires, and clinical diagnostic interviews, every 6 months for 3 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that youth-report best predicted concurrent episodes, and that both youth and parent-report were necessary to adequately forecast prospective episodes. More specifically, youth-reported negative mood symptoms and parent-reported anhedonic symptoms incrementally predicted future depressive episodes. Findings were invariant to youth's sex and age, and results from person and variable-centered analyses suggested that discrepancies between informants were not clinically meaningful. Implications for future research and evidence-based decision making for depression screening initiatives are discussed.
很少有研究检验多来源抑郁筛查方法的增量有效性。有鉴于此,我们研究了为识别同时期或前瞻性抑郁发作,推荐使用多来源方法的建议可能会有何不同。参与者包括 663 名青少年(年龄=11.83;年龄=2.40)及其照顾者,他们独立完成了青少年抑郁问卷和临床诊断访谈,每 6 个月进行一次,持续 3 年。接收者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,青少年报告最能预测同时期发作,而青少年和父母报告都需要充分预测前瞻性发作。更具体地说,青少年报告的负面情绪症状和父母报告的快感缺失症状可递增预测未来的抑郁发作。这些发现不受青少年性别和年龄的影响,并且来自个体和变量中心的分析结果表明,信息提供者之间的差异没有临床意义。讨论了对未来研究和基于证据的抑郁筛查计划决策的影响。