Páez Alvaro, Redondo Enrique, Juárez Nuria, Cachón Ana, Crespo Luis, Manresa Susana, Gálvez Maria Luisa, Rendón David, Alarcón Rommel, Aguilar Luis, Durán Manuel
Urology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Nov;65(9):808-15.
To test patient's satisfaction after consultation in the outpatient area of the Urology Department in a public hospital using a structured interview.
We used the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (CAM) standard interview form modified to include three questions related to the implementation of a 'one-visit'policy and nurses' empowerment. Patients' opinions were gathered with respect to waiting times in the waiting room, facilities, and staff kindness and professionalism. Sample size was estimated in 386 patients. The effect of every predictive factor on the overall satisfaction was tested using the chi square test. To define the effect of every variable in presence of the rest of covariates a logistic regression model was used.
Participation reached 65.5%. Overall, 86.4% of the patients were satisfied. Irrespectively of the professional and personal style, the quality perception was homogeneous (p=ns). Multivariate analysis couldn't disclose any independent predictive variable. Only the perception in the item 'overall time available for the consultation' approached statistical significance (p=0.08), with patients scoring high in this variable getting the highest overall satisfaction scores.
There was no personal or professional style particularly related with patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, there is a slight trend towards a higher satisfaction when patients feel enough time has been spent in their consultation. The new organizational resources (one-visit clinic and nurses' empowerment) are both welcome but are not clearly related to patient satisfaction.
采用结构化访谈测试公立医院泌尿外科门诊咨询后患者的满意度。
我们使用了马德里自治区(CAM)标准访谈表,并进行了修改,纳入了与“一站式”政策实施及护士赋权相关的三个问题。收集了患者对候诊时间、设施以及工作人员的友善程度和专业水平的意见。估计样本量为386名患者。使用卡方检验测试每个预测因素对总体满意度的影响。为了在存在其他协变量的情况下定义每个变量的影响,使用了逻辑回归模型。
参与率达到65.5%。总体而言,86.4%的患者表示满意。无论专业和个人风格如何,质量感知是同质的(p=无统计学意义)。多变量分析未能揭示任何独立的预测变量。只有“咨询可用总时间”这一项的感知接近统计学意义(p=0.08),在该变量上得分高的患者总体满意度得分最高。
没有特定的个人或专业风格与患者满意度相关。然而,当患者感觉咨询时间充足时,有轻微的满意度提高趋势。新的组织资源(一站式诊所和护士赋权)都受到欢迎,但与患者满意度没有明显关联。