Kim S H, Choi B I, Lee H P, Kang S B, Choi Y M, Han M C, Kim C W
Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Radiology. 1990 Apr;175(1):45-51. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.1.2315503.
Thirty patients with uterine cervical carcinoma underwent computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and surgical exploration. MR imaging was superior to CT in visualization of the tumor. MR imaging had an accuracy of 77% in the assessment of thickness of cervical stromal invasion. The accuracy rates of these modalities for parametrial evaluation were 78% for clinical evaluation, 70% for CT, and 92% for MR imaging. The overall accuracy rates for tumor staging were 70% for clinical evaluation, 63% for CT, and 83% for MR imaging. MR imaging is superior to clinical evaluation and CT in parametrial evaluation and the staging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
30例子宫颈癌患者接受了计算机断层扫描（CT）、磁共振（MR）成像及手术探查。在肿瘤可视化方面，MR成像优于CT。MR成像在评估宫颈基质浸润深度方面的准确率为77%。这些检查方式用于宫旁组织评估的准确率分别为：临床评估78%、CT 70%、MR成像92%。肿瘤分期的总体准确率分别为：临床评估70%、CT 63%、MR成像83%。在子宫颈癌的宫旁组织评估及分期方面，MR成像优于临床评估和CT。
