Clinical Translational Medicine Center, Harbin Medical University, China.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013 Jan;19(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/cns.12029. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
Solid organ transplantations became a clinical option in the 1950s. The hand allograft was the pioneer of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA), successfully started near the end of the last century despite arguments over the practicality and methods. Since then, CTA such as hand and face has continued to progress from the theoretical to clinical reality. The treatment principles, drug combinations, and mechanisms of the immunosuppression medications on which contemporary transplant surgeries have been based continue to develop as researchers and physicians gain more experience in the CTA field. It could be argued that the ethical issues associated with CTA have prevented evolution of the field rather than surgical or technical skill. This is particularly true for allo-head and body reconstruction (AHBR). How can leaders in the field of CTA develop a model that would satisfy ethical concerns? Bolstered by recent successes in the field, is it time to traverse the next frontier? Can AHBR ever be a feasible option in the clinical setting? The reader will be provided with a brief history of CTA from theory to research to clinical practice. A concise description of AHBR as it pertains to the critical procedure (i.e., surgery design) will also be discussed.
实体器官移植在 20 世纪 50 年代成为一种临床选择。异体手移植是复合组织同种异体移植(CTA)的先驱,尽管对其实用性和方法存在争议,但在上个世纪末成功开展。从那时起,手和面部等 CTA 不断从理论走向临床现实。随着研究人员和医生在 CTA 领域积累更多经验,当代移植手术所依据的免疫抑制药物的治疗原则、药物组合和机制仍在不断发展。有人可能会认为,与 CTA 相关的伦理问题阻碍了该领域的发展,而不是手术或技术技能。异体头身重建(AHBR)尤其如此。CTA 领域的领导者如何制定一个既能满足伦理关注又能满足伦理关注的模型?最近该领域的成功是否为跨越下一个前沿提供了契机?在临床环境中,AHBR 是否可行?读者将了解到 CTA 从理论到研究再到临床实践的简要历史。还将简要介绍与关键程序(即手术设计)相关的 AHBR。