Ramlall S
Department of Psychiatry, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2012 Nov;15(6):407-10. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.49.
The Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002 (MHCA) was promulgated in 2004. It has been hailed as one of the most progressive pieces of mental health legislation. A true measure of its merit is the degree to which it has transformed mental health services and in particular improved the quality of care. This paper will describe the impact of the Act on mental health care service delivery in the country. Literature pertaining to the MHCA published from 2006-2012, a report compiled by the South African Society of Psychiatrists and the results of a national survey conducted among Heads of Departments of Psychiatry, Mental Health Review Boards and Provincial Directors of Mental Health was reviewed. The MHCA has been successful in shifting the emphasis of care from psychiatric institutions to general hospitals. However, the integration of services has been hampered by infrastructure constraints and shortages of mental health personnel. It has been less successful in integrating mental health care into primary health services where the focus remains largely on the pharmacological maintenance treatment of the chronically mentally ill. Little attention has been given to the health promotion, disease prevention and rehabilitation aspects of care. Mental health review boards contend with limited resources, administrative challenges and limited political support. Isolated pockets of success characterised the implementation of the MHCA across the country. Greater investment of resources is needed to ensure the comprehensive implementation of the Act.
2002年第17号《精神卫生保健法》(MHCA)于2004年颁布。它被誉为最具进步性的精神卫生立法之一。衡量其价值的一个真正标准是它对精神卫生服务的变革程度,尤其是对护理质量的提升程度。本文将描述该法案对该国精神卫生保健服务提供的影响。回顾了2006年至2012年发表的与《精神卫生保健法》相关的文献、南非精神病学家协会编制的一份报告以及在精神病学系主任、精神卫生审查委员会和省级精神卫生主任中进行的一项全国性调查的结果。《精神卫生保健法》成功地将护理重点从精神病院转移到了综合医院。然而,服务整合受到基础设施限制和精神卫生人员短缺的阻碍。在将精神卫生保健纳入初级卫生服务方面,该法案不太成功,初级卫生服务的重点仍然主要是对慢性精神病患者的药物维持治疗。对护理的健康促进、疾病预防和康复方面关注甚少。精神卫生审查委员会面临资源有限、行政挑战和政治支持不足的问题。《精神卫生保健法》在全国的实施呈现出一些孤立的成功案例。需要加大资源投入以确保该法案的全面实施。