Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Bielefeld University Bielefeld, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 15;3:486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486. eCollection 2012.
People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references.
人们常用空间词汇来描述时间关系,这也促使人们尝试将空间参照系(FoR)映射到时间上。最近的研究表明,在如何概念化空间方面存在差异的语言群体,在如何概念化时间方面可能也存在差异,更具体地说,对空间 FoR 的偏好应该会延伸到时间领域。在这里,我们通过(a)审查关于时间参照的最新研究数据,(b)比较我们之前在关于空间和时间 FoR 偏好的四项语言研究中收集的数据,(c)分析新的类似时间任务的动态空间任务数据,以及(d)评估英语使用者在空间和时间上的个体偏好的共变,来仔细研究这一假设。虽然第一组数据呈现出混杂的情况,但后三组数据并不支持跨领域参照偏好密切相关的假设。我们探讨了这种不一致的可能原因,并讨论了对时间参照研究的影响。