Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Am Psychol. 2012 Nov;67(8):721-30. doi: 10.1037/a0029876.
Despite the "awakening" to the importance of culture in psychology in America, international psychology has remained on the sidelines of psychological science. The author recounts her personal and professional experience in tandem with the stages of development in international/cross-cultural psychology. Based on her research in cross-cultural personality assessment, the author discusses the inadequacies of sole reliance on either the etic or the emic approach and points out the advantages of a combined emic-etic approach in bridging global and local human experiences in psychological science and practice. With the blurring of the boundaries between North American-European psychologies and psychology in the rest of the world, there is a need to mainstream culture in psychology's epistemological paradigm. Borrowing from the concept of gender mainstreaming that embraces both similarities and differences in promoting equal opportunities, the author discusses the parallel needs of acknowledging universals and specifics when mainstreaming culture in psychology. She calls for building a culturally informed universal knowledge base that should be incorporated in the psychology curriculum and textbooks.
尽管美国心理学界已经意识到文化的重要性,但国际心理学仍处于心理学科学的边缘。作者结合个人经历和职业经历,以及国际/跨文化心理学的发展阶段,进行了叙述。基于她在跨文化人格评估方面的研究,作者讨论了单纯依赖“整体论”或“本土论”方法的不足之处,并指出了结合“整体论-本土论”方法的优势,这种方法可以在心理科学和实践中弥合全球和地方人类经验之间的差距。随着北美-欧洲心理学与世界其他地区心理学之间界限的模糊,有必要将文化纳入心理学认识论范式的主流。借鉴性别主流化的概念,该概念既承认促进机会均等的相似之处,也承认其差异,作者讨论了在心理学中主流化文化时承认普遍性和特殊性的平行需求。她呼吁建立一个有文化意识的普遍知识库,该知识库应纳入心理学课程和教材。