Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;66(12):1178-88. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12026.
AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the evidence regarding the adverse effects (AEs) of homeopathy. METHOD: Five electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant case reports and case series. RESULTS: In total, 38 primary reports met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 30 pertained to direct AEs of homeopathic remedies; and eight were related to AEs caused by the substitution of conventional medicine with homeopathy. The total number of patients who experienced AEs of homeopathy amounted to 1159. Overall, AEs ranged from mild-to-severe and included four fatalities. The most common AEs were allergic reactions and intoxications. Rhus toxidendron was the most frequently implicated homeopathic remedy. CONCLUSION: Homeopathy has the potential to harm patients and consumers in both direct and indirect ways. Clinicians should be aware of its risks and advise their patients accordingly.
目的：本系统评价旨在批判性地评估顺势疗法不良反应（AE）的证据。 方法：检索了五个电子数据库，以确定所有相关的病例报告和病例系列。 结果：共有 38 篇原始报告符合纳入标准。其中，30 篇与顺势疗法药物的直接不良反应有关；8 篇与用顺势疗法替代传统药物引起的不良反应有关。发生顺势疗法不良反应的患者总数为 1159 例。总的来说，不良反应从轻度到重度不等，包括 4 例死亡。最常见的不良反应是过敏反应和中毒。Rhus toxidendron 是最常被牵连的顺势疗法药物。 结论：顺势疗法有可能直接和间接地伤害患者和消费者。临床医生应该意识到它的风险，并相应地为他们的患者提供建议。
Int J Clin Pract. 2012-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-12-13
J Altern Complement Med. 2018-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-1-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Front Psychol. 2024-5-27
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024-8
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023-2-20
Urologe A. 2021-7
Zotero 插件