Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 19;12:407. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-407.
There are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement. Accurately describing and assessing quality of clinical documentation is a necessary improvement in an increasingly team-based healthcare delivery system. In this paper we describe the quality of outpatient clinical notes from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.
Using purposeful sampling for maximum diversity, we conducted focus groups and individual interviews with clinicians, nursing and ancillary staff, patients, and healthcare administrators at six federal health care facilities between 2009 and 2011. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using open, axial and selective coding.
The 163 participants included 61 clinicians, 52 nurse/ancillary staff, 31 patients and 19 administrative staff. Three organizing themes emerged: 1) characteristics of quality in clinical notes, 2) desired elements within the clinical notes and 3) system supports to improve the quality of clinical notes. We identified 11 codes to describe characteristics of clinical notes, 20 codes to describe desired elements in quality clinical notes and 11 codes to describe clinical system elements that support quality when writing clinical notes. While there was substantial overlap between the aspects of quality described by the four stakeholder groups, only clinicians and administrators identified ease of translation into billing codes as an important characteristic of a quality note. Only patients rated prioritization of their medical problems as an aspect of quality. Nurses included care and education delivered to the patient, information added by the patient, interdisciplinary information, and infection alerts as important content.
Perspectives of these four stakeholder groups provide a comprehensive description of quality in outpatient clinical documentation. The resulting description of characteristics and content necessary for quality notes provides a research-based foundation for assessing the quality of clinical documentation in outpatient health care settings.
目前尚无经过实证检验的标准或工具可用于定义或衡量门诊临床文档的质量。门诊临床记录用于记录医疗服务、传达治疗计划并支持患者安全、医学教育、医疗法律调查和报销。准确描述和评估临床文档的质量是在日益以团队为基础的医疗服务提供系统中进行必要改进的关键。在本文中,我们从多个利益相关者的角度描述了门诊临床记录的质量。
采用具有最大多样性的目的性抽样,我们在 2009 年至 2011 年间在六家联邦医疗机构中与临床医生、护理和辅助人员、患者以及医疗保健管理人员进行了焦点小组和个人访谈。所有会议都进行了录音,并使用开放式、轴向式和选择性编码对转录内容进行了定性分析。
163 名参与者包括 61 名临床医生、52 名护理/辅助人员、31 名患者和 19 名行政人员。有三个组织主题出现:1)临床记录质量的特征;2)临床记录中所需的元素;3)提高临床记录质量的系统支持。我们确定了 11 个描述临床记录特征的代码、20 个描述高质量临床记录所需元素的代码和 11 个描述支持临床记录书写质量的临床系统元素的代码。虽然四个利益相关者群体描述的质量方面存在很大的重叠,但只有临床医生和管理人员将易于转换为计费代码作为高质量记录的一个重要特征。只有患者将他们的医疗问题的优先级视为质量的一个方面。护士将提供给患者的护理和教育、患者提供的信息、跨学科信息和感染警报视为重要内容。
这四个利益相关者群体的观点提供了门诊临床文档质量的全面描述。对高质量记录所需的特征和内容的描述为评估门诊医疗保健环境中的临床文档质量提供了基于研究的基础。