Suppr超能文献

门诊临床记录质量:通过定性研究得出的利益相关者定义。

Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 19;12:407. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-407.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement. Accurately describing and assessing quality of clinical documentation is a necessary improvement in an increasingly team-based healthcare delivery system. In this paper we describe the quality of outpatient clinical notes from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

METHODS

Using purposeful sampling for maximum diversity, we conducted focus groups and individual interviews with clinicians, nursing and ancillary staff, patients, and healthcare administrators at six federal health care facilities between 2009 and 2011. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using open, axial and selective coding.

RESULTS

The 163 participants included 61 clinicians, 52 nurse/ancillary staff, 31 patients and 19 administrative staff. Three organizing themes emerged: 1) characteristics of quality in clinical notes, 2) desired elements within the clinical notes and 3) system supports to improve the quality of clinical notes. We identified 11 codes to describe characteristics of clinical notes, 20 codes to describe desired elements in quality clinical notes and 11 codes to describe clinical system elements that support quality when writing clinical notes. While there was substantial overlap between the aspects of quality described by the four stakeholder groups, only clinicians and administrators identified ease of translation into billing codes as an important characteristic of a quality note. Only patients rated prioritization of their medical problems as an aspect of quality. Nurses included care and education delivered to the patient, information added by the patient, interdisciplinary information, and infection alerts as important content.

CONCLUSIONS

Perspectives of these four stakeholder groups provide a comprehensive description of quality in outpatient clinical documentation. The resulting description of characteristics and content necessary for quality notes provides a research-based foundation for assessing the quality of clinical documentation in outpatient health care settings.

摘要

背景

目前尚无经过实证检验的标准或工具可用于定义或衡量门诊临床文档的质量。门诊临床记录用于记录医疗服务、传达治疗计划并支持患者安全、医学教育、医疗法律调查和报销。准确描述和评估临床文档的质量是在日益以团队为基础的医疗服务提供系统中进行必要改进的关键。在本文中,我们从多个利益相关者的角度描述了门诊临床记录的质量。

方法

采用具有最大多样性的目的性抽样,我们在 2009 年至 2011 年间在六家联邦医疗机构中与临床医生、护理和辅助人员、患者以及医疗保健管理人员进行了焦点小组和个人访谈。所有会议都进行了录音,并使用开放式、轴向式和选择性编码对转录内容进行了定性分析。

结果

163 名参与者包括 61 名临床医生、52 名护理/辅助人员、31 名患者和 19 名行政人员。有三个组织主题出现:1)临床记录质量的特征;2)临床记录中所需的元素;3)提高临床记录质量的系统支持。我们确定了 11 个描述临床记录特征的代码、20 个描述高质量临床记录所需元素的代码和 11 个描述支持临床记录书写质量的临床系统元素的代码。虽然四个利益相关者群体描述的质量方面存在很大的重叠,但只有临床医生和管理人员将易于转换为计费代码作为高质量记录的一个重要特征。只有患者将他们的医疗问题的优先级视为质量的一个方面。护士将提供给患者的护理和教育、患者提供的信息、跨学科信息和感染警报视为重要内容。

结论

这四个利益相关者群体的观点提供了门诊临床文档质量的全面描述。对高质量记录所需的特征和内容的描述为评估门诊医疗保健环境中的临床文档质量提供了基于研究的基础。

相似文献

1
Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 19;12:407. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-407.
2
4
Health records as the basis of clinical coding: Is the quality adequate? A qualitative study of medical coders' perceptions.
Health Inf Manag. 2020 Jan;49(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/1833358319826351. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Medical Scribe Impact on Patient and Provider Experience.
Mil Med. 2019 Oct 1;184(9-10):388-393. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz030.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Hospital Course Summarization by an Electronic Health Record-Based Large Language Model.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526339. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26339.
2
Assessment of the Quality of Medical Record Documentation using the CRABEL Score Method in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Oct-Dec;16(4):137-142. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_857_24. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Using artificial intelligence to develop a measure of orthopaedic treatment success from clinical notes.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 24;7:1523953. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1523953. eCollection 2025.
5
Publications Are More Than Lines on Your Curriculum Vitae: An Epistle to Residents (and Faculty).
Cureus. 2025 Jan 23;17(1):e77882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77882. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
A Hospital Medical Record Quality Scoring Tool (MeReQ): Development, Validation, and Results of a Pilot Study.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 27;12(3):331. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030331.
9
Assessing the Assessment-Developing and Deploying a Novel Tool for Evaluating Clinical Notes' Diagnostic Assessment Quality.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(9):2123-2129. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08085-8. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9).
Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3(2):164-174. doi: 10.4338/aci-2011-11-ra-0070.
2
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):811-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00003.
3
Qualitative research methods for medical educators.
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;11(5):375-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):181-6. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007237. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
Generating Clinical Notes for Electronic Health Record Systems.
Appl Clin Inform. 2010 Jan 1;1(3):232-243. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-03-RA-0019.
6
Medical education & health informatics: time to join the 21st century?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):567-71.
7
Open notes: doctors and patients signing on.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):121-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00008.
8
America's "undiscovered" laboratory for health services research.
Med Care. 2010 Aug;48(8):751-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e35be8.
10
Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验