• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达布西亚地区医疗机构分娩的预测因素:一项横断面研究。

Predictors for health facility delivery in Busia district of Uganda: a cross sectional study.

机构信息

Makerere University School of Public Health, P,O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 20;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-132.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-132
PMID:23167791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3514288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among the factors contributing to the high maternal morbidity and mortality in Uganda is the high proportion of pregnant women who do not deliver under supervision in health facilities. This study aimed to identify the independent predictors of health facility delivery in Busia a rural district in Uganda with a view of suggesting measures for remedial action.

METHODS

In a cross sectional survey, 500 women who had a delivery in the past two years (from November 16 2005 to November 15 2007) were interviewed regarding place of delivery, demographic characteristics, reproductive history, attendance for antenatal care, accessibility of health services, preferred delivery positions, preference for disposal of placenta and mother's autonomy in decision making. In addition the household socio economic status was assessed. The independent predictors of health facility delivery were identified by comparing women who delivered in health facilities to those who did not, using bivariate and binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eight independent predictors that favoured delivery in a health facility include: being of high socio-economic status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.8 95% Confidence interval [95% CI]1.2-6.3), previous difficult delivery (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 3.0-8.0), parity less than four (AOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.6), preference of supine position for second stage of labour (AOR 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-11.1) preferring health workers to dispose the placenta (AOR 12.1, 95% CI 4.3-34.1), not having difficulty with transport (AOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5), being autonomous in decision to attend antenatal care (AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) and depending on other people (e.g. spouse) in making a decision of where to deliver from (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.6). A model with these 8 variables had an overall correct classification of 81.4% (chi square = 230.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in order to increase health facility deliveries there is need for reaching women of low social economic status and of higher parity with suitable interventions aimed at reducing barriers that make women less likely to deliver in health units such as ensuring availability of transport and involving spouses in the birth plan.

摘要

背景

在乌干达导致孕产妇高发病率和死亡率的因素中,有相当大比例的孕妇不在医疗机构中分娩。本研究旨在确定布西亚农村地区(乌干达的一个农村地区)医疗机构分娩的独立预测因素,以期提出补救措施。

方法

在一项横断面调查中,对 500 名在过去两年内分娩的妇女(2005 年 11 月 16 日至 2007 年 11 月 15 日)进行了访谈,内容包括分娩地点、人口统计学特征、生殖史、产前护理就诊情况、卫生服务的可及性、首选分娩体位、胎盘处理方式以及母亲在决策中的自主权。此外,还评估了家庭社会经济状况。通过比较在医疗机构分娩的妇女和不在医疗机构分娩的妇女,使用单变量和二元逻辑回归分析,确定了有利于医疗机构分娩的独立预测因素。

结果

有 8 个独立的预测因素有利于在医疗机构分娩,包括:社会经济地位较高(调整后的优势比[OR]2.8,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.2-6.3)、上次分娩困难(OR 4.2,95%CI 3.0-8.0)、产次小于 4 次(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.6-5.6)、第二产程喜欢仰卧位(OR 5.9,95%CI 3.5-11.1)、更喜欢卫生工作者处理胎盘(OR 12.1,95%CI 4.3-34.1)、运输无困难(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.2-3.5)、在决定接受产前护理时自主(OR 1.9,95%CI 1.1-3.4)以及在做出分娩地点决策时依赖他人(例如配偶)(OR 2.4,95%CI 1.4-4.6)。这个包含这 8 个变量的模型的整体正确分类率为 81.4%(卡方=230.3,P<0.001)。

结论

这些数据表明,为了增加医疗机构分娩的数量,需要针对社会经济地位较低和产次较高的妇女采取适当的干预措施,减少使妇女不太可能在医疗机构分娩的障碍,例如确保交通的可用性,并让配偶参与分娩计划。

相似文献

1
Predictors for health facility delivery in Busia district of Uganda: a cross sectional study.乌干达布西亚地区医疗机构分娩的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 20;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-132.
2
Losing women along the path to safe motherhood: why is there such a gap between women's use of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance? A mixed methods study in northern Uganda.在安全孕产之路上失去女性:为何女性产前护理的使用与熟练接生服务之间存在如此大的差距?乌干达北部的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 4;15:287. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0695-9.
3
They receive antenatal care in health facilities, yet do not deliver there: predictors of health facility delivery by women in rural Ghana.她们在医疗机构接受产前保健,但不在那里分娩:加纳农村地区妇女选择在医疗机构分娩的预测因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 3;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1749-6.
4
Prevalence and predictors of institutional delivery among pregnant mothers in Biharamulo district, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚比哈马穆洛区孕妇机构分娩的患病率及预测因素:一项横断面研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 May 25;21:51. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.51.6347. eCollection 2015.
5
Health facility or home delivery? Factors influencing the choice of delivery place among mothers living in rural communities of Eritrea.医疗机构分娩还是在家分娩?影响厄立特里亚农村社区母亲分娩地点选择的因素。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2018 Oct 22;37(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41043-018-0153-1.
6
Factors affecting institutional delivery in rural Chitwan district of Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study.尼泊尔奇旺农村地区影响机构分娩的因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 13;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0454-y.
7
Mothers employed in paid work and their predictors for home delivery in Pakistan.巴基斯坦有偿工作的母亲及其在家分娩的预测因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1945-4.
8
Factors associated with utilization of motorcycle ambulances by pregnant women in rural eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.乌干达东部农村地区孕妇使用摩托车救护车的相关因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 3;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0808-0.
9
Utilization of institutional delivery service at Wukro and Butajera districts in the Northern and South Central Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚北部和中南部的乌克罗和布塔杰拉地区机构分娩服务的利用情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 28;14:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-178.
10
Factors influencing place of delivery for women in Kenya: an analysis of the Kenya demographic and health survey, 2008/2009.影响肯尼亚妇女分娩地点的因素:肯尼亚人口与健康调查 2008/2009 年分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 17;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-40.

引用本文的文献

1
'This is like tradition, lie on your back, hold your leg, and push': understanding midwives' perspectives on their choice of labour positions in a Ugandan hospital.“这就像传统做法,仰卧,抱住腿,然后用力”:了解乌干达一家医院助产士对分娩姿势选择的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 13;25(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07657-2.
2
Assessment of maternal healthcare services among the women of reproductive age in the rural municipality of Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔农村自治区育龄妇女的孕产妇保健服务评估:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Feb 8;3(1):e000916. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000916. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Mixed-methods reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and practices survey of IDPs, returnees and host communities in Jonglei State, South Sudan.南苏丹琼莱州境内流离失所者、回返者和收容社区的生殖健康知识、态度和行为混合方法调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):e083905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083905.
4
Effect of a mother-baby delivery pack on institutional deliveries: A community intervention trial to address maternal mortality in rural Zambia.母婴分娩包对机构分娩的影响:一项旨在解决赞比亚农村地区孕产妇死亡率的社区干预试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0296001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296001. eCollection 2024.
5
A scoping review of the residual barriers to skilled birth attendance in Ghana: A conceptual framework and a fish bone analysis.加纳熟练助产服务剩余障碍的范围审查:概念框架与鱼骨分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;4(2):e0002902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002902. eCollection 2024.
6
Influence of Sociodemographic Factors and Obstetric History on Choice of Place of Delivery: A Retrospective Study Among Post-Natal Women in Ghana.社会人口学因素和产科病史对分娩地点选择的影响:加纳产后妇女的一项回顾性研究
Int J MCH AIDS. 2023;12(2):e639. doi: 10.21106/ijma.639. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
7
Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.预测桑给巴尔基于医疗机构的分娩情况:机器学习算法对抗击性攻击的脆弱性。
Heliyon. 2023 May 13;9(5):e16244. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16244. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Effect of emergency obstetric care and proximity to comprehensive facilities on facility-based delivery in Malawi and Haiti.紧急产科护理及与综合设施的距离对马拉维和海地基于设施的分娩的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;2(2):e0000184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000184. eCollection 2022.
9
Continuum of care in maternal, newborn and child health in Indonesia: Evidence from the Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey.印度尼西亚孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康的连续护理:来自印度尼西亚人口与健康调查的证据。
J Public Health Res. 2022 Oct 10;11(4):22799036221127619. doi: 10.1177/22799036221127619. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Machine learning for maternal health: Predicting delivery location in a community health worker program in Zanzibar.用于孕产妇健康的机器学习:预测桑给巴尔社区卫生工作者项目中的分娩地点。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;4:855236. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.855236. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Community perception of intestinal schistosomiasis in Busia district of Uganda.乌干达布西亚区社区对肠道血吸虫病的认知
East Afr Med J. 2007 Feb;84(2):56-66. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v84i2.9505.
2
Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternity care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh.服务可及性是否会减少孕产妇就医方面的社会经济差异?来自孟加拉国农村地区的证据。
J Biosoc Sci. 2008 Jan;40(1):19-33. doi: 10.1017/S0021932007002258. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
3
The impact of including husbands in antenatal health education services on maternal health practices in urban Nepal: results from a randomized controlled trial.尼泊尔城市地区将丈夫纳入产前健康教育服务对孕产妇健康行为的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
Health Educ Res. 2007 Apr;22(2):166-76. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl060. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
4
Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion.评估男性参与作为性与生殖健康促进策略的情况。
Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):389-96. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah312.
5
Changing health-seeking behaviour in Matlab, Bangladesh: do development interventions matter?孟加拉国马特莱地区就医行为的改变:发展干预措施重要吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Sep;18(3):306-15. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czg037.
6
Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources.乌干达农村地区孕产妇服务利用率低:妇女地位、传统观念及资源有限的影响
Reprod Health Matters. 2003 May;11(21):16-26. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(03)02176-1.
7
NGO-promoted microcredit programs and women's empowerment in rural Bangladesh: quantitative and qualitative evidence.非政府组织推动的小额信贷项目与孟加拉国农村地区妇女赋权:定量与定性证据
J Dev Areas. 1998 Winter;32(2):221-36.
8
WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care.世界卫生组织用于评估新型常规产前保健模式的产前保健随机试验。
Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04722-x.
9
Factors associated with unfavourable birth outcomes in Kenya.肯尼亚与不良出生结局相关的因素。
J Biosoc Sci. 2001 Apr;33(2):199-225. doi: 10.1017/s0021932001001997.
10
Factors influencing choice of delivery sites in Rakai district of Uganda.影响乌干达拉凯地区分娩地点选择的因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(2):203-13. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00275-0.