比较疗效研究的流行病学和统计学方法。
Epidemiologic and statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research.
机构信息
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA.
出版信息
Heart Fail Clin. 2013 Jan;9(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Abstract
Observational methods are evolving in response to the widespread availability of data from clinical registries, electronic health records, and administrative databases. These approaches will never eliminate the need for randomized trials, but clearly have a role in evaluating the effect of therapies in unselected populations treated in routine practice.
摘要
观察性研究方法正在随着临床注册数据库、电子健康记录和管理数据库中数据的广泛应用而不断发展。这些方法永远不会取代随机临床试验，但在评估常规实践中治疗的未经选择的人群的治疗效果方面显然具有一定作用。
相似文献
1
Epidemiologic and statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Heart Fail Clin. 2013 Jan;9(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
2
Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Data sources for heart failure comparative effectiveness research.
Heart Fail Clin. 2013 Jan;9(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
4
Can statistical linkage of missing variables reduce bias in treatment effect estimates in comparative effectiveness research studies?
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):455-63. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.23. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.005.
6
[Not Available].
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Nov;110(11):528. doi: 10.1701/3265.32350.
7
Super learning to hedge against incorrect inference from arbitrary parametric assumptions in marginal structural modeling.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.016.
8
[Administrative databases provide observational studies with high quality].
Tunis Med. 2012 Jun;90(6):425-6.
9
Effectiveness in the Absence of Efficacy: Cautionary Tales From Real-World Evidence.
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1047-1050. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02105. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Randomized trials or population-based registries.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.014.
引用本文的文献
1
Improving the Quality and Design of Retrospective Clinical Outcome Studies that Utilize Electronic Health Records.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2020 Jun 27;1(3):131-138. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1094. eCollection 2020.
2
Adjusting for confounding by indication in observational studies: a case study in traumatic brain injury.
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 18;10:841-852. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S154500. eCollection 2018.
3
Current use of routinely collected health data to complement randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological survey.
CMAJ Open. 2016 Apr 6;4(2):E132-40. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150036. eCollection 2016 Apr-Jun.
4
Role of Tiotropium in Reducing Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease When Combined With Long-Acting β -Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids: The OUTPUL Study.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Nov;56(11):1423-1432. doi: 10.1002/jcph.750.
5
Comparative effectiveness research and its utility in In-clinic practice.
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173780.
6
Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey.
BMJ. 2016 Feb 8;352:i493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i493.
7
Adherence to Guidelines in Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review.
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Apr 15;38(8):1072-1085. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4121. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
本文引用的文献
1
Future directions for cardiovascular disease comparative effectiveness research: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.057. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
2
Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 24;171(2):110-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.352. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
3
Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jun;19(6):537-54. doi: 10.1002/pds.1908.
4
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III.
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1062-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00602.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
5
Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers.
Am Heart J. 2009 Jun;157(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.002.
6
Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
7
Some old and some new statistical tools for outcomes research.
Circulation. 2008 Aug 19;118(8):872-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.766907.
8
Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.
JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):278-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278.
9
Statins and the risk of lung, breast, and colorectal cancer in the elderly.
Circulation. 2007 Jan 2;115(1):27-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.650176. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
10
The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):20-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.2739.
Zotero 插件