• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Future directions for cardiovascular disease comparative effectiveness research: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.心血管疾病比较效果研究的未来方向:国家心肺血液研究所赞助的研讨会报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.057. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
2
Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.肺部疾病和睡眠障碍的比较效果研究:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会的建议。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):848-56. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634WS.
3
The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.比较效 用研究在输血医学临床试验中的作用:国家心、肺、血液研究所研讨会的报告。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
4
Comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics and precision medicine: current landscape and future prospects.癌症基因组学和精准医学中的比较疗效研究:现状与未来展望。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 3;105(13):929-36. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt108. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Can CER be an effective tool for change in the development and assessment of new drugs and technologies?成本效果分析(CER)能否成为新药和新技术研发及评估中推动变革的有效工具?
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5 Supp A):S06-11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.s5-a.S06.
6
Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.心血管成像的结果研究:美国国立心肺血液研究所主办的研讨会报告
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul;2(7):897-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.01.018.
7
The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.比较疗效研究对介入性疼痛管理的影响:从医疗保险现代化法案到患者保护与平价医疗法案以及患者为中心的医疗成果研究所的演变。
Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):E249-82.
8
Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.心血管成像的结果研究:美国国立心肺血液研究所主办的研讨会报告
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul;2(4):339-48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.123999.
9
Comparative effectiveness research - what is it and how does one do it?比较疗效研究——它是什么,如何进行?
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013 Sep;14(3):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
It is important to distinguish CER from patient-centered outcomes research. Introduction.区分成本效果分析(CER)与以患者为中心的结局研究很重要。引言。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 May;18(4 Suppl A):S3-4. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.S8-A.S03.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method.基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的 CAC 评分联合临床特征对阻塞性冠心病的预测价值:机器学习方法。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9.
2
The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation.在缩小慢性疾病差距方面的更广泛考虑因素——关注心力衰竭和实施。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(2):e120522204690. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220512160737.
3
Association of biological antirheumatic therapy with risk for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study in incident rheumatoid arthritis.生物抗风湿治疗与 2 型糖尿病风险的关联:一项新诊断类风湿关节炎的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e042246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042246.
4
Understanding Vulnerable Plaques: Current Status and Future Directions.了解易损斑块:现状与未来方向。
Korean Circ J. 2019 Dec;49(12):1115-1122. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0211.
5
Plaque imaging with CT-a comprehensive review on coronary CT angiography based risk assessment.基于CT的斑块成像——关于冠状动脉CT血管造影风险评估的全面综述
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Oct;7(5):489-506. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.11.06.
6
Validity of Cardiovascular Data From Electronic Sources: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and HealthLNK.电子来源心血管数据的有效性:动脉粥样硬化与健康LNK多族裔研究
Circulation. 2017 Sep 26;136(13):1207-1216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027436. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Plaque characteristics and inflammatory markers for the prediction of major cardiovascular events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.用于预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者主要心血管事件的斑块特征和炎症标志物
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;33(10):1445-1454. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1135-x. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Smartphone-Based Geofencing to Ascertain Hospitalizations.基于智能手机的地理围栏技术用于确定住院情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003326.
9
Robotic surgery is the optimal approach for mitral surgery.机器人手术是二尖瓣手术的最佳方法。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;5(6):563-566. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.10.01.
10
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized Trial.胸痛患者入院进行遥测时冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与放射性核素心肌灌注显像的比较:一项随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 4;163(3):174-83. doi: 10.7326/M14-2948.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.左心室功能障碍患者的冠状动脉旁路手术。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1607-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100356. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
2
Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes.强化血糖控制对心血管结局的长期影响。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):818-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006524.
3
2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2010年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会无症状成人心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):e50-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001.
4
Health-care policy. To reform U.S. health care, start with systematic reviews.医疗保健政策。要改革美国的医疗保健体系,从系统评价入手。
Science. 2010 Jul 30;329(5991):516-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1189330.
5
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010年冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影专家共识文件:美国心脏病学基金会专家共识文件特别工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2663-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.013.
6
Comparative effectiveness research: what kind of studies do we need?比较疗效研究:我们需要什么样的研究?
J Investig Med. 2010 Aug;58(6):764-9. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e3d2af.
7
Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change.重新思考用于比较效果研究的随机临床试验:变革的必要性。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):206-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00126. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
8
A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.2型糖尿病与冠状动脉疾病治疗的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2503-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805796. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
9
Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病退伍军人的血糖控制与血管并发症
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
10
The perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).抗栓治疗的围手术期管理:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第8版)
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):299S-339S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0675.

心血管疾病比较效果研究的未来方向:国家心肺血液研究所赞助的研讨会报告。

Future directions for cardiovascular disease comparative effectiveness research: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5405, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.057. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.057
PMID:22796257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3416944/
Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to provide decision makers with the evidence needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of alternative clinical management strategies. CER has become a national priority, with considerable new research funding allocated. Cardiovascular disease is a priority area for CER. This workshop report provides an overview of CER methods, with an emphasis on practical clinical trials and observational treatment comparisons. The report also details recommendations to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for a new framework for evidence development to foster cardiovascular CER, and specific studies to address 8 clinical issues identified by the Institute of Medicine as high priorities for cardiovascular CER.

摘要

比较效果研究(CER)旨在为决策者提供评估替代临床管理策略的益处和危害所需的证据。CER 已成为国家优先事项,分配了大量新的研究资金。心血管疾病是 CER 的重点领域。本研讨会报告提供了 CER 方法的概述,重点介绍了实用的临床试验和观察性治疗比较。该报告还详细介绍了向美国国立心肺血液研究所(National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute)提出的建议,以制定新的证据开发框架,促进心血管 CER,并开展具体研究,以解决医学研究所确定的 8 个临床问题,这些问题是心血管 CER 的重点。