Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York, 10029.
Brain Behav. 2012 Nov;2(6):741-53. doi: 10.1002/brb3.80. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
Existing evidence suggests that reward and attentional networks function in concert and that activation in one system influences the other in a reciprocal fashion; however, the nature of these influences remains poorly understood. We therefore developed a three-component task to assess the interaction effects of reward anticipation and conflict resolution on the behavioral performance and the activation of brain reward and attentional systems. Sixteen healthy adult volunteers aged 21-45 years were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing the task. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with cue (reward vs. non-reward) and target (congruent vs. incongruent) as within-subjects factors was used to test for main and interaction effects. Neural responses to anticipation, conflict, and reward outcomes were tested. Behaviorally there were main effects of both reward cue and target congruency on reaction time. Neuroimaging results showed that reward anticipation and expected reward outcomes activated components of the attentional networks, including the inferior parietal and occipital cortices, whereas surprising non-rewards activated the frontoinsular cortex bilaterally and deactivated the ventral striatum. In turn, conflict activated a broad network associated with cognitive control and motor functions. Interaction effects showed decreased activity in the thalamus, anterior cingulated gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus bilaterally when difficult conflict trials (e.g., incongruent targets) were preceded by reward cues; in contrast, the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex showed greater activation during congruent targets preceded by reward cues. These results suggest that reward anticipation is associated with lower activation in attentional networks, possibly due to increased processing efficiency, whereas more difficult, conflict trials are associated with lower activity in regions of the reward system, possibly because such trials are experienced as less rewarding.
现有证据表明,奖励和注意力网络协同工作,一个系统的激活以相互影响的方式影响另一个系统;然而,这些影响的性质仍知之甚少。因此,我们开发了一个三组件任务来评估奖励预期和冲突解决对行为表现和大脑奖励和注意力系统激活的交互作用。16 名年龄在 21-45 岁的健康成年志愿者在进行任务时接受了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)扫描。使用双因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),以线索(奖励与非奖励)和目标(一致与不一致)作为被试内因素,测试主效应和交互效应。测试了对预期、冲突和奖励结果的神经反应。行为上,奖励线索和目标一致性都对反应时间有主要影响。神经影像学结果表明,奖励预期和预期奖励结果激活了注意力网络的组成部分,包括下顶叶和枕叶皮质,而令人惊讶的非奖励则双侧激活额岛皮质并去激活腹侧纹状体。反过来,冲突激活了与认知控制和运动功能相关的广泛网络。交互效应表明,当困难冲突试验(例如,不一致的目标)之前出现奖励线索时,双侧丘脑、前扣带和额中回的活动减少;相比之下,在奖励线索之前出现一致的目标时,腹侧纹状体和眶额皮质的激活增加。这些结果表明,奖励预期与注意力网络的低激活相关,可能是由于处理效率提高,而更困难的冲突试验与奖励系统区域的低活动相关,可能是因为这些试验被体验为不那么有奖励。