Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 21;12:415. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-415.
Although primary health care (PHC) is a key component of all health care systems, services are not always readily available, accessible or affordable. This systematic review examines effective strategies to enhance access to best practice processes of PHC in three domains: chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care.
An extensive search of bibliographic data bases to identify peer and non-peer reviewed literature was undertaken. Identified papers were screened to identify and classify intervention studies that measured the impact of strategies (singly or in combination) on change in use or the reach of services in defined population groups (evaluated interventions).
The search identified 3,148 citations of which 121 were intervention studies and 75 were evaluated interventions. Evaluated interventions were found in all three domains: prevention (n = 45), episodic care (n = 19), and chronic disease management (n = 11). They were undertaken in a number of countries including Australia (n = 25), USA (n = 25), and UK (n = 15). Study quality was ranked as high (31% of studies), medium (61%) and low (8%). The 75 evaluated interventions tested a range of strategies either singly (n = 46 studies) or as a combination of two (n = 20) or more strategies (n = 9). Strategies targeted both health providers and patients and were categorised to five groups: practice re-organisation (n = 43 studies), patient support (n = 29), provision of new services (n = 19), workforce development (n = 11), and financial incentives (n = 9). Strategies varied by domain, reflecting the complexity of care needs and processes. Of the 75 evaluated interventions, 55 reported positive findings with interventions using a combination of strategies more likely to report positive results.
This review suggests that multiple, linked strategies targeting different levels of the health care system are most likely to improve access to best practice PHC. The proposed changes in the structure of PHC in Australia may provide opportunities to investigate the factors that influence access to best practice PHC and to develop and implement effective, evidence based strategies to address these.
虽然初级卫生保健(PHC)是所有卫生保健系统的关键组成部分,但服务并不总是随时可用、可及或负担得起。本系统评价研究了在三个领域中增强最佳 PHC 实践流程可及性的有效策略:慢性病管理、预防和 episodic care。
广泛搜索文献数据库,以确定同行评审和非同行评审文献。对确定的论文进行筛选,以识别和分类干预研究,这些研究衡量了策略(单独或组合使用)对特定人群中服务使用或覆盖范围变化的影响(评估干预)。
搜索共确定了 3148 条引文,其中 121 条为干预研究,75 条为评估干预。在所有三个领域都发现了评估干预:预防(n=45)、 episodic care(n=19)和慢性病管理(n=11)。它们在包括澳大利亚(n=25)、美国(n=25)和英国(n=15)在内的多个国家开展。研究质量被评为高(31%的研究)、中(61%)和低(8%)。75 项评估干预测试了一系列策略,包括单独使用(n=46 项研究)或组合使用两种(n=20 项)或更多策略(n=9 项)。策略针对卫生提供者和患者,并分为五个组:实践重新组织(n=43 项研究)、患者支持(n=29 项)、提供新服务(n=19 项)、劳动力发展(n=11 项)和财务激励(n=9 项)。策略因领域而异,反映了护理需求和流程的复杂性。在 75 项评估干预中,55 项报告了积极结果,使用多种策略的干预更有可能报告积极结果。
本综述表明,针对卫生保健系统不同层次的多种、关联策略最有可能改善最佳实践 PHC 的可及性。澳大利亚初级卫生保健结构的拟议变化可能为研究影响最佳实践 PHC 可及性的因素以及制定和实施有效、基于证据的策略提供机会,以解决这些问题。