Suppr超能文献

在行为大鼠的条件性恐惧反应中,杏仁核和海马体的血液动力学反应可以区分厌恶刺激和中性刺激。

Hemodynamic responses in amygdala and hippocampus distinguish between aversive and neutral cues during Pavlovian fear conditioning in behaving rats.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Feb;37(3):498-507. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12057. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Abstract

Lesion and electrophysiological studies in rodents have identified the amygdala and hippocampus (HPC) as key structures for Pavlovian fear conditioning, but human functional neuroimaging studies have not consistently found activation of these structures. This could be because hemodynamic responses cannot detect the sparse neuronal activity proposed to underlie conditioned fear. Alternatively, differences in experimental design or fear levels could account for the discrepant findings between rodents and humans. To help distinguish between these alternatives, we used tissue oxygen amperometry to record hemodynamic responses from the basolateral amygdala (BLA), dorsal HPC (dHPC) and ventral HPC (vHPC) in freely-moving rats during the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear. To enable specific comparison with human studies we used a discriminative paradigm, with one auditory cue [conditioned stimulus (CS)+] that was always followed by footshock, and another auditory cue (CS-) that was never followed by footshock. BLA tissue oxygen signals were significantly higher during CS+ than CS- trials during training and early extinction. In contrast, they were lower during CS+ than CS- trials by the end of extinction. dHPC and vHPC tissue oxygen signals were significantly lower during CS+ than CS- trials throughout extinction. Thus, hemodynamic signals in the amygdala and HPC can detect the different patterns of neuronal activity evoked by threatening vs. neutral stimuli during fear conditioning. Discrepant neuroimaging findings may be due to differences in experimental design and/or fear levels evoked in participants. Our methodology offers a way to improve translation between rodent models and human neuroimaging.

摘要

损伤和电生理学研究在啮齿动物中已经确定了杏仁核和海马体(HPC)是条件性恐惧形成的关键结构,但人类功能神经影像学研究并未一致发现这些结构的激活。这可能是因为血液动力学反应无法检测到稀疏的神经元活动,这些活动被认为是条件性恐惧的基础。或者,实验设计或恐惧水平的差异可能解释了啮齿动物和人类之间的不一致发现。为了帮助区分这些替代方案,我们使用组织氧安培法记录了自由移动大鼠在条件性恐惧的获得和消退期间,基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)、背侧 HPC(dHPC)和腹侧 HPC(vHPC)的血液动力学反应。为了能够与人类研究进行具体比较,我们使用了一种鉴别性范式,其中一个听觉线索[条件刺激(CS)+]总是伴随着电击,而另一个听觉线索(CS-)则从不伴随着电击。在训练和早期消退期间,BLA 组织氧信号在 CS+试验中明显高于 CS-试验。相比之下,在消退末期,CS+试验中的组织氧信号低于 CS-试验。dHPC 和 vHPC 的组织氧信号在整个消退过程中在 CS+试验中明显低于 CS-试验。因此,杏仁核和 HPC 的血液动力学信号可以检测到威胁性与中性刺激在恐惧形成过程中引起的不同模式的神经元活动。神经影像学发现的差异可能是由于实验设计和/或参与者引起的恐惧水平的差异。我们的方法为改善啮齿动物模型和人类神经影像学之间的转化提供了一种途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b07/3638322/715c113f1d98/ejn0037-0498-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验