• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鸣不适、适应性及主观响度的预测因素

Predictors of tinnitus discomfort, adaptation and subjective loudness.

作者信息

Scott B, Lindberg P, Melin L, Lyttkens L

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Audiol. 1990 Feb;24(1):51-62. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077842.

DOI:10.3109/03005369009077842
PMID:2317601
Abstract

In a nation-wide investigation, covering all the hearing centres in Sweden, a study was made of adaptation processes, subjective discomfort from tinnitus, subjective loudness of tinnitus and psychological complaints in 3372 subjects by means of a questionnaire. The most important predictors of discomfort from and adaptation to tinnitus were found to be the controllability and the degree of maskability by external sounds, i.e. the subject's coping abilities or internal-external locus of control. Increased control and masking effects from the environment imply a decrease in discomfort and better adaptation. The most important predictor of worsened subjective loudness of tinnitus was the duration of the tinnitus. That is, subjects who had had tinnitus for a longer time perceived the loudness as more intense. The psychosomatic factors which most strongly predicted increased discomfort from and decreased tolerance to tinnitus were depression and insomnia. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for the management and treatment of tinnitus.

摘要

在一项覆盖瑞典所有听力中心的全国性调查中,通过问卷调查对3372名受试者的适应过程、耳鸣引起的主观不适、耳鸣的主观响度和心理问题进行了研究。发现耳鸣不适和适应的最重要预测因素是可控性以及外部声音的掩蔽程度,即受试者的应对能力或内外控制点。环境中控制和掩蔽效果的增强意味着不适的减少和更好的适应。耳鸣主观响度恶化的最重要预测因素是耳鸣的持续时间。也就是说,耳鸣时间较长的受试者感觉响度更强。最能强烈预测耳鸣不适增加和耐受性降低的身心因素是抑郁和失眠。这些发现对耳鸣的管理和治疗具有理论和实际意义。

相似文献

1
Predictors of tinnitus discomfort, adaptation and subjective loudness.耳鸣不适、适应性及主观响度的预测因素
Br J Audiol. 1990 Feb;24(1):51-62. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077842.
2
Gender and chronic tinnitus: differences in tinnitus-related distress depend on age and duration of tinnitus.性别与慢性耳鸣:耳鸣相关困扰的差异取决于年龄和耳鸣持续时间。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):661-72. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828149f2.
3
[Multivariate analysis using quantitative methods to evaluate the subjective loudness of tinnitus].[使用定量方法进行多变量分析以评估耳鸣的主观响度]
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2001 Jun;104(6):694-702. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.104.694.
4
The psychological treatment of tinnitus: an experimental evaluation.耳鸣的心理治疗:一项实验评估。
Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(6):593-603. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90143-5.
5
Experiencing tinnitus: which factors are important for perceived severity of the symptom?耳鸣体验:哪些因素对症状的感知严重程度至关重要?
Int Tinnitus J. 2003;9(2):130-3.
6
The comparison of acoustic and psychic parameters of subjective tinnitus.主观耳鸣的声学和心理参数比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1655-2. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
7
When tinnitus loudness and annoyance are discrepant: audiological characteristics and psychological profile.当耳鸣响度与烦恼程度不一致时:听力学特征及心理状况
Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(6):391-400. doi: 10.1159/000106482. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
8
Examining the short term effects of emotion under an Adaptation Level Theory model of tinnitus perception.在耳鸣感知的适应水平理论模型下研究情绪的短期影响。
Hear Res. 2017 Mar;345:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 25.
9
Tinnitus loudness and the severity of insomnia: a mediation analysis.耳鸣响度与失眠严重程度:中介分析。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Apr;58(4):208-212. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1537524. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Multivariate analyses of tinnitus complaint and change in tinnitus complaint: a masker study.耳鸣主诉及耳鸣主诉变化的多变量分析:一项掩蔽器研究。
Br J Audiol. 1987 Nov;21(4):259-72. doi: 10.3109/03005368709076418.

引用本文的文献

1
[Chronic tinnitus from a psychological perspective].[从心理学角度看慢性耳鸣]
HNO. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01586-4.
2
The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Total Score: What Really Counts? Experience on a Sample of 1156 Patients.耳鸣障碍量表总分:真正重要的是什么?对1156例患者样本的研究经验
Audiol Res. 2025 Jan 16;15(1):4. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010004.
3
Bridging the Gap between Psychophysiological and Audiological Factors in the Assessment of Tinnitus: An EEG Investigation in the Beta Band.耳鸣评估中心理生理因素与听力学因素之间的差距弥合:β波段的脑电图研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 3;14(6):570. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060570.
4
Tinnitus: Clinical Insights in Its Pathophysiology-A Perspective.耳鸣:病理生理学的临床见解——一种观点。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun;25(3):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00939-0. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Daily Contributors of Tinnitus Loudness and Distress: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.耳鸣响度和痛苦的日常影响因素:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 5;16:883665. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.883665. eCollection 2022.
6
Vascular-Metabolic Risk Factors and Psychological Stress in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus.血管代谢危险因素与慢性耳鸣患者的心理压力。
Nutrients. 2022 May 28;14(11):2256. doi: 10.3390/nu14112256.
7
Tinnitus: at a crossroad between phantom perception and sleep.耳鸣:处于幻听与睡眠的交叉点
Brain Commun. 2022 Apr 5;4(3):fcac089. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac089. eCollection 2022.
8
Outcomes of Triple-Combination Therapy for Chronic Tinnitus.三联疗法治疗慢性耳鸣的疗效。
In Vivo. 2019 Sep-Oct;33(5):1707-1712. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11660.
9
Results of an Interdisciplinary Day Care Approach for Chronic Tinnitus Treatment: A Prospective Study Introducing the Jena Interdisciplinary Treatment for Tinnitus.慢性耳鸣治疗的跨学科日间护理方法的结果:一项引入耶拿耳鸣跨学科治疗的前瞻性研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Jun 16;9:192. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00192. eCollection 2017.
10
A Mixed-Methods Trial of Broad Band Noise and Nature Sounds for Tinnitus Therapy: Group and Individual Responses Modeled under the Adaptation Level Theory of Tinnitus.一项关于宽带噪声和自然声音治疗耳鸣的混合方法试验:基于耳鸣适应水平理论的群体和个体反应模型
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Mar 9;9:44. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00044. eCollection 2017.