Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Clinic, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun;25(3):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00939-0. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Tinnitus, the perception of sound without a corresponding external sound source, and tinnitus disorder, which is tinnitus with associated suffering, present a multifaceted clinical challenge due to its heterogeneity and its incompletely understood pathophysiology and especially due to the limited therapeutic options. In this narrative review, we give an overview on various clinical aspects of tinnitus including its heterogeneity, contributing factors, comorbidities and therapeutic pathways with a specific emphasis on the implications for its pathophysiology and future research directions. Tinnitus exhibits high perceptual variability between affected individuals (heterogeneity) and within affected individuals (temporal variability). Hearing loss emerges as predominant risk factor and the perceived pitch corresponds to areas of hearing loss, supporting the compensatory response theory. Whereas most people who have tinnitus can live a normal life, in 10-20% tinnitus interferes severely with quality of life. These patients suffer frequently from comorbidities such as anxiety, depression or insomnia, acting as both risk factors and consequences. Accordingly, neuroimaging studies demonstrate shared brain networks between tinnitus and stress-related disorders shedding light on the intricate interplay of mental health and tinnitus. The challenge lies in deciphering causative relationships and shared pathophysiological mechanisms. Stress, external sounds, time of day, head movements, distraction, and sleep quality can impact tinnitus perception. Understanding these factors provides insights into the interplay with autonomic, sensory, motor, and cognitive processes. Counselling and cognitive-behavioural therapy demonstrate efficacy in reducing suffering, supporting the involvement of stress and anxiety-related networks. Hearing improvement, especially through cochlear implants, reduces tinnitus and thus indirectly validates the compensatory nature of tinnitus. Brain stimulation techniques can modulate the suffering of tinnitus, presumably by alteration of stress-related brain networks. Continued research is crucial for unravelling the complexities of tinnitus. Progress in management hinges on decoding diverse manifestations, identifying treatment-responsive subtypes, and advancing targeted therapeutic approaches.
耳鸣是一种没有相应外部声源的声音感知,而耳鸣障碍是指伴有相关痛苦的耳鸣,由于其异质性和不完全理解的病理生理学,尤其是由于治疗选择有限,它呈现出多方面的临床挑战。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们概述了耳鸣的各种临床方面,包括其异质性、促成因素、共病和治疗途径,并特别强调了其对病理生理学的影响和未来的研究方向。耳鸣在受影响的个体之间(异质性)和受影响的个体内部(时间变异性)表现出高度的感知变异性。听力损失是主要的风险因素,感知到的音调与听力损失区域相对应,支持代偿反应理论。虽然大多数患有耳鸣的人可以过正常的生活,但在 10-20%的患者中,耳鸣严重干扰了生活质量。这些患者经常患有焦虑、抑郁或失眠等共病,既是风险因素,也是后果。因此,神经影像学研究表明,耳鸣与应激相关障碍之间存在共享的大脑网络,揭示了心理健康和耳鸣之间错综复杂的相互作用。挑战在于破译因果关系和共享的病理生理机制。压力、外部声音、一天中的时间、头部运动、注意力分散和睡眠质量都会影响耳鸣的感知。了解这些因素可以深入了解与自主、感觉、运动和认知过程的相互作用。咨询和认知行为疗法在减轻痛苦方面显示出疗效,支持了应激和焦虑相关网络的参与。听力改善,尤其是通过人工耳蜗植入,可以减轻耳鸣,从而间接验证了耳鸣的代偿性质。脑刺激技术可以调节耳鸣的痛苦,可能是通过改变与应激相关的大脑网络。继续研究对于揭示耳鸣的复杂性至关重要。管理方面的进展取决于解码多样化的表现、识别对治疗有反应的亚型以及推进有针对性的治疗方法。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024-6
Lancet Neurol. 2013-9
Intern Med J. 2024-7
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-12-27
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015-10
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2009-12
Int Tinnitus J. 2017-12-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-1-31
Sci Rep. 2025-7-30
J Clin Med. 2025-2-15
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024-10
J Int Adv Otol. 2023-11
Brain Sci. 2023-10-23
Prog Brain Res. 2023
Otol Neurotol. 2023-7-1
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023-5-3
J Clin Med. 2023-4-24
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-4-14
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023-2