Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 25;60(25):2653-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1010. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
The goal of this study was to compare the prognostic efficacy of the 6-min walk (6MW) and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) tests in stable outpatients with chronic heart failure (HF).
CPX and 6MW tests are commonly applied as prognostic gauges for systolic HF patients, but few direct comparisons have been conducted.
Stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and III systolic HF patients (ejection fraction ≤ 35%) from the HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) trial were studied. 6MW distance (6MWD) and CPX indices (peak oxygen consumption [VO(2)] and ventilatory equivalents for exhaled carbon dioxide [VE/VCO(2)] slope) were compared as predictors of all-cause mortality/hospitalization and all-cause mortality over 2.5 years of mean follow-up.
A total of 2,054 HF-ACTION participants underwent both CPX and 6MW tests at baseline (median age 59 years; 71% male; 64% NYHA functional class II and 36% NYHA functional class III/IV). In unadjusted models and in models that included key clinical and demographic covariates, C-indices of 6MWD were 0.58 and 0.65 (unadjusted) and 0.62 and 0.72 (adjusted) in predicting all-cause mortality/hospitalization and all-cause mortality, respectively. C-indices for peak VO(2) were 0.61 and 0.68 (unadjusted) and 0.63 and 0.73 (adjusted). C-indices for VE/VCO(2) slope were 0.56 and 0.65 (unadjusted) and 0.61 and 0.71 (adjusted); combining peak VO(2) and VE/VCO(2) slope did not improve the C-indices. Overlapping 95% confidence intervals and modest integrated discrimination improvement values confirmed similar prognostic discrimination by 6MWD and CPX indices within adjusted models.
In systolic HF outpatients, 6MWD and CPX indices demonstrated similar utility as univariate predictors for all-cause hospitalization/mortality and all-cause mortality. However, 6MWD or CPX indices added only modest prognostic discrimination to models that included important demographic and clinical covariates.
本研究旨在比较 6 分钟步行(6MW)和心肺运动(CPX)测试在慢性心力衰竭(HF)稳定门诊患者中的预后效能。
CPX 和 6MW 测试常用于评估射血分数≤35%的收缩性 HF 患者的预后,但很少进行直接比较。
HF-ACTION(心力衰竭:一项评估运动训练效果的对照试验)试验中纳入了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能 II 级和 III 级稳定的收缩性 HF 患者(射血分数≤35%),研究了 6MW 距离(6MWD)和 CPX 指标(峰值摄氧量[VO2]和呼气二氧化碳通气当量比[VE/VCO2]斜率)作为全因死亡率/住院和 2.5 年平均随访期间全因死亡率的预测因子。
HF-ACTION 共有 2054 名参与者在基线时同时进行了 CPX 和 6MW 测试(中位年龄 59 岁;71%为男性;64%为 NYHA 心功能 II 级,36%为 NYHA 心功能 III/IV 级)。在未调整模型和包括关键临床和人口统计学协变量的模型中,6MWD 的 C 指数分别为 0.58 和 0.65(未调整)和 0.62 和 0.72(调整),分别用于预测全因死亡率/住院和全因死亡率。峰值 VO2 的 C 指数分别为 0.61 和 0.68(未调整)和 0.63 和 0.73(调整)。VE/VCO2 斜率的 C 指数分别为 0.56 和 0.65(未调整)和 0.61 和 0.71(调整);结合峰值 VO2 和 VE/VCO2 斜率并未提高 C 指数。重叠的 95%置信区间和适度的综合鉴别改善值证实,在调整后的模型中,6MWD 和 CPX 指标的预后判别能力相似。
在射血分数降低的 HF 门诊患者中,6MWD 和 CPX 指标作为全因住院/死亡率和全因死亡率的预测因子具有相似的效用。然而,6MWD 或 CPX 指标仅为包括重要人口统计学和临床协变量的模型增加了适度的预后判别能力。