• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于变量选择和风险预测的正则化胜率回归及其在心血管试验中的应用。

Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.

作者信息

Mao Lu

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 Walnut St, Room 207 A, Madison, 53726, WI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w
PMID:40247173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12004665/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The win ratio has been widely used in the analysis of hierarchical composite endpoints, which prioritize critical outcomes such as mortality over nonfatal, secondary events. Although a regression framework exists to incorporate covariates, it is limited to low-dimensional datasets and may struggle with numerous predictors. This gap necessitates a robust variable selection method tailored to the win ratio framework.

METHODS

We propose an elastic net-type regularization approach for win ratio regression, extending the proportional win-fractions (PW) model in low-dimensional settings. The method addresses key challenges, including adapting pairwise comparisons to penalized regression, optimizing model selection through subject-level cross-validation, and defining performance metrics via a generalized concordance index. The procedures are implemented in the wrnet R-package, publicly available at https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ .

RESULTS

Simulation studies demonstrate that wrnet outperforms traditional (regularized) Cox regression for time-to-first-event analysis, particularly in scenarios with differing covariate effects on mortality and nonfatal events. When applied to data from the HF-ACTION trial, the method identified prognostic variables and achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to regularized Cox models, as measured by overall and component-specific concordance indices.

CONCLUSION

The wrnet approach combines the interpretability and clinical relevance of the win ratio with the scalability and robustness of elastic net regularization. The accompanying R-package provides a user-friendly interface for routine application of the procedures, whenever appropriate. Future research could explore additional applications or refine the methodology to address non-proportionalities in win-loss risks and nonlinearities in covariate effects.

摘要

背景

胜率已广泛用于分层复合终点的分析,在这种分析中,诸如死亡率等关键结局比非致命性次要事件具有更高优先级。尽管存在一个纳入协变量的回归框架,但它仅限于低维数据集,并且可能难以处理众多预测变量。这一差距需要一种专门针对胜率框架的稳健变量选择方法。

方法

我们提出一种用于胜率回归的弹性网络型正则化方法,扩展了低维情况下的比例赢率(PW)模型。该方法解决了关键挑战,包括使成对比较适应惩罚回归、通过个体水平交叉验证优化模型选择以及通过广义一致性指数定义性能指标。这些程序在wrnet R包中实现,可在https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ 上公开获取。

结果

模拟研究表明,在首次事件发生时间分析中,wrnet优于传统(正则化)Cox回归,特别是在协变量对死亡率和非致命事件有不同影响的情况下。当应用于HF-ACTION试验的数据时,与正则化Cox模型相比,该方法识别出了预后变量,并在总体和特定成分一致性指数的衡量下实现了更高的预测准确性。

结论

wrnet方法将胜率的可解释性和临床相关性与弹性网络正则化的可扩展性和稳健性相结合。随附的R包提供了一个用户友好的界面,以便在适当的时候对这些程序进行常规应用。未来的研究可以探索更多应用或改进该方法,以解决输赢风险的非比例性和协变量效应的非线性问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/6ceac8c1f0fa/12874_2025_2554_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/f5d52b3b7a73/12874_2025_2554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/92939d71e5b5/12874_2025_2554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/9b9df2a69858/12874_2025_2554_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/6ceac8c1f0fa/12874_2025_2554_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/f5d52b3b7a73/12874_2025_2554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/92939d71e5b5/12874_2025_2554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/9b9df2a69858/12874_2025_2554_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c1/12004665/6ceac8c1f0fa/12874_2025_2554_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.用于变量选择和风险预测的正则化胜率回归及其在心血管试验中的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w.
2
Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.用于变量选择和风险预测的正则化胜率回归及其在心血管试验中的应用。
Res Sq. 2025 Feb 7:rs.3.rs-5836301. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5836301/v1.
3
Stratified proportional win-fractions regression analysis.分层比例优势分数回归分析。
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 20;41(26):5305-5318. doi: 10.1002/sim.9570. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Identification of clinically relevant features in hypertensive patients using penalized regression: a case study of cardiovascular events.使用惩罚回归识别高血压患者的临床相关特征:心血管事件的案例研究。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Sep;57(9):2011-2026. doi: 10.1007/s11517-019-02007-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
A class of proportional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.一类用于复合结局的比例获胜分数回归模型。
Biometrics. 2021 Dec;77(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.1111/biom.13382. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
6
A win ratio approach to the re-analysis of Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.一种用于重新分析多重危险因素干预试验的胜率方法。
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):626-634. doi: 10.1177/1740774519868233. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Evaluating key predictors of breast cancer through survival: a comparison of AFT frailty models with LASSO, ridge, and elastic net regularization.通过生存分析评估乳腺癌的关键预测因素:AFT脆弱模型与LASSO、岭回归和弹性网络正则化的比较
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14040-z.
8
Robust estimation of the expected survival probabilities from high-dimensional Cox models with biomarker-by-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials.在随机临床试验中,通过生物标志物与治疗的相互作用,从高维Cox模型中稳健估计预期生存概率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 May 22;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0354-0.
9
eNetXplorer: an R package for the quantitative exploration of elastic net families for generalized linear models.eNetXplorer:用于广义线性模型中弹性网络家族的定量探索的 R 包。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Apr 16;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2778-5.
10
High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.高维Cox模型:作为模型构建过程一部分的惩罚项选择
Biom J. 2010 Feb;52(1):50-69. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900064.

本文引用的文献

1
Development a nomogram prognostic model for survival in heart failure patients based on the HF-ACTION data.基于 HF-ACTION 数据开发心力衰竭患者生存预测列线图模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02593-1.
2
Elastic Net Regularization Paths for All Generalized Linear Models.所有广义线性模型的弹性网络正则化路径
J Stat Softw. 2023;106. doi: 10.18637/jss.v106.i01. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
The win ratio method in heart failure trials: lessons learnt from EMPULSE.心力衰竭试验中的赢率法:来自 EMPULSE 的经验教训。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 May;25(5):632-641. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2853. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
4
On recurrent-event win ratio.论再发事件赢率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1120-1134. doi: 10.1177/09622802221084134. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Win odds: An adaptation of the win ratio to include ties.胜率:对胜率的一种调整,包括平局。
Stat Med. 2021 Jun 30;40(14):3367-3384. doi: 10.1002/sim.8967. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Effect of High-Dose Trivalent vs Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine on Mortality or Cardiopulmonary Hospitalization in Patients With High-risk Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高剂量三价流感疫苗与标准剂量四价流感疫苗对伴有高危心血管疾病患者的死亡率或心肺住院率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 5;325(1):39-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23649.
7
A class of proportional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.一类用于复合结局的比例获胜分数回归模型。
Biometrics. 2021 Dec;77(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.1111/biom.13382. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
The win ratio approach for composite endpoints: practical guidance based on previous experience.复合终点的胜率方法:基于以往经验的实用指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 7;41(46):4391-4399. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa665.
9
Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes.分层生存结局的优先一致性指数。
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 10;38(15):2868-2882. doi: 10.1002/sim.8157. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
10
Time-to-first-event versus recurrent-event analysis: points to consider for selecting a meaningful analysis strategy in clinical trials with composite endpoints.时间至首次事件分析与复发性事件分析:在具有复合终点的临床试验中选择有意义的分析策略时需要考虑的要点。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):437-443. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1205-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.