Cardiologie, Hôpital René-Muret, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov;105(11):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
Despite continuous improvements in management of patients with cancer, cardiac side-effects still account for a substantial limitation of chemotherapy. Evaluation of cardiac toxicity in patients includes consideration of biomarkers such as cardiac troponins and B-type natriuretic peptides, together with non-invasive imaging in the form of 2D-, 3D-, or strain-echocardiography, multiple gated radionuclide angiography, quantitative gated blood-pool SPECT, (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. These approaches differ from each other with regards to availability, accuracy, sensitivity to detect early stages of cardiac injury, individual reliability, ease of use in a longitudinal follow-up perspective, and to related cost-effectiveness. Improving prevention of these cardiac side-effects depends on several, currently unresolved issues. Early detection and quantification of cardiac damage is required to adapt chemotherapy in progress for optimal management of patients. Whether increased availability of myocardial strain imaging and repeat blood biomarkers determinations will reliably and consistently achieve these goals remain to be confirmed. Also, protective approaches to reduce cardiac toxicity of anticancer drugs should be reconsidered according to the recently restricted approval for use of dexrazoxane. Anthracycline-based regimens, encapsulated anthracyclines and non-anthracycline regimens should be revisited with regards to antitumour efficacy and cardiac toxicity. Cardiovascular drugs that proved effective in prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity in experimental models should be investigated in clinical trials. Finally, the efficacy of cardiovascular drugs that have already been tested in clinical settings should be confirmed and compared with each other in patients in increased numbers.
尽管癌症患者的管理不断得到改善,但心脏副作用仍然是化疗的一个重大限制。对患者心脏毒性的评估包括考虑心脏肌钙蛋白和 B 型利钠肽等生物标志物,以及二维、三维或应变超声心动图、多门控放射性核素血管造影、定量门控血池 SPECT、(123)I-间碘苄胍闪烁显像或心脏磁共振成像等非侵入性成像方式。这些方法在可用性、准确性、对心脏损伤早期阶段的敏感性、个体可靠性、在纵向随访中的易用性以及相关的成本效益方面存在差异。改善这些心脏副作用的预防取决于几个目前尚未解决的问题。需要早期检测和量化心脏损伤,以便在进展中的化疗中进行调整,从而实现患者的最佳管理。增加心肌应变成像和重复血液生物标志物测定的可用性是否能可靠和一致地实现这些目标,仍有待证实。此外,根据最近对右雷佐生使用的限制批准,应该重新考虑减少抗癌药物心脏毒性的保护方法。蒽环类药物为基础的方案、包裹蒽环类药物和非蒽环类药物方案应根据抗肿瘤疗效和心脏毒性进行重新评估。在实验模型中已被证明可预防蒽环类药物引起的心脏毒性的心血管药物应在临床试验中进行研究。最后,应在更多数量的患者中确认和比较已在临床环境中测试过的心血管药物的疗效。