Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jan;34(4):300-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs398. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
Considerable excitement and interest have arisen recently concerning the role that acute emotional triggers may play in precipitating a myocardial infarction (MI). Observational studies have found repeatedly that patients report excessive anger, anxiety, sadness, grief, or acute stress immediately prior to onset of MI, and recent meta-analyses summarizing these findings reported strong associations between MI occurrence and many of these acute emotions. However, it is unclear whether and through what mechanisms acute emotional triggers might influence MI, and whether there is any clinical utility in knowing if or how emotions trigger MI. We debate whether emotional triggers matter by reviewing the recent evidence for the association between acute emotional triggers and MI and by describing the potential pathophysiological characteristics and mechanisms underlying this association and the preventive strategies that could be used to mitigate the risk of acute MI. We also examine whether the study of emotional triggers could influence clinical risk management or changes in clinical practice/management. We offer suggestions for research that might shed light on whether emotional triggers could initiate a paradigm shift in preventive cardiology, or whether acute emotional triggers are either intractable catalysts for, or merely an epiphenomenon of, some MIs.
最近,人们对急性情绪触发因素在引发心肌梗死(MI)方面可能扮演的角色产生了极大的兴趣和关注。观察性研究反复发现,患者在 MI 发作前会报告过度的愤怒、焦虑、悲伤、悲痛或急性压力,最近总结这些发现的荟萃分析报告了 MI 发生与许多这些急性情绪之间存在强烈关联。然而,目前尚不清楚急性情绪触发因素是否以及通过何种机制可能影响 MI,以及了解情绪是否以及如何引发 MI 是否具有任何临床实用性。我们通过回顾急性情绪触发因素与 MI 之间关联的最新证据,以及描述潜在的病理生理特征和机制,以及可以用来减轻急性 MI 风险的预防策略,来讨论情绪触发因素是否重要。我们还研究了研究情绪触发因素是否会影响临床风险管理或临床实践/管理的变化。我们提出了一些研究建议,这些建议可能有助于阐明情绪触发因素是否可以引发预防心脏病学的范式转变,或者急性情绪触发因素是否是某些 MI 的难以控制的催化剂,或者仅仅是其表象。