Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY USA.
St. John's University New York NY USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e032698. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032698. Epub 2024 May 1.
Provoked anger is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease events. The underlying mechanism linking provoked anger as well as other core negative emotions including anxiety and sadness to cardiovascular disease remain unknown. The study objective was to examine the acute effects of provoked anger, and secondarily, anxiety and sadness on endothelial cell health.
Apparently healthy adult participants (n=280) were randomized to an 8-minute anger recall task, a depressed mood recall task, an anxiety recall task, or an emotionally neutral condition. Pre-/post-assessments of endothelial health including endothelium-dependent vasodilation (reactive hyperemia index), circulating endothelial cell-derived microparticles (CD62E+, CD31+/CD42-, and CD31+/Annexin V+) and circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (CD34+/CD133+/kinase insert domain receptor+ endothelial progenitor cells and CD34+/kinase insert domain receptor+ endothelial progenitor cells) were measured. There was a group×time interaction for the anger versus neutral condition on the change in reactive hyperemia index score from baseline to 40 minutes (=0.007) with a mean±SD change in reactive hyperemia index score of 0.20±0.67 and 0.50±0.60 in the anger and neutral conditions, respectively. For the change in reactive hyperemia index score, the anxiety versus neutral condition group by time interaction approached but did not reach statistical significance (=0.054), and the sadness versus neutral condition group by time interaction was not statistically significant (=0.160). There were no consistent statistically significant group×time interactions for the anger, anxiety, and sadness versus neutral condition on endothelial cell-derived microparticles and endothelial progenitor cells from baseline to 40 minutes.
In this randomized controlled experimental study, a brief provocation of anger adversely affected endothelial cell health by impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
被激怒与心血管疾病事件风险增加有关。将被激怒以及其他核心负性情绪(包括焦虑和悲伤)与心血管疾病联系起来的潜在机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨被激怒以及其次的焦虑和悲伤对血管内皮细胞健康的急性影响。
将 280 名健康的成年参与者随机分为愤怒回忆任务、抑郁情绪回忆任务、焦虑回忆任务或情绪中性条件。在基线至 40 分钟的时间点上,评估内皮细胞健康的指标,包括内皮依赖性血管舒张(反应性充血指数)、循环内皮细胞衍生的微颗粒(CD62E+、CD31+/CD42-和 CD31+/Annexin V+)和循环骨髓源性内皮祖细胞(CD34+/CD133+/激酶插入结构域受体+内皮祖细胞和 CD34+/激酶插入结构域受体+内皮祖细胞)。愤怒与中性条件相比,在基线至 40 分钟时的反应性充血指数评分变化上存在组间×时间交互作用(=0.007),愤怒和中性条件下的反应性充血指数评分变化的平均值±标准差分别为 0.20±0.67 和 0.50±0.60。对于反应性充血指数评分的变化,焦虑与中性条件相比的组间×时间交互作用接近但未达到统计学显著性(=0.054),而悲伤与中性条件相比的组间×时间交互作用无统计学意义(=0.160)。在基线至 40 分钟时,愤怒、焦虑和悲伤与中性条件相比,在内皮细胞衍生的微颗粒和内皮祖细胞方面,没有一致的统计学显著的组间×时间交互作用。
在这项随机对照实验研究中,短暂的愤怒激发会通过损害内皮依赖性血管舒张来不良地影响内皮细胞健康。