Suppr超能文献

采用吸附法、光氧化法、臭氧化法和高级氧化工艺(UV/H₂O₂、O₃/H₂O₂ 和 O₃/活性炭)去除水溶液中的邻苯二甲酸二乙酯。

Removal of diethyl phthalate from water solution by adsorption, photo-oxidation, ozonation and advanced oxidation process (UV/H₂O₂, O₃/H₂O₂ and O₃/activated carbon).

机构信息

Centro de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. M. Nava No.6, San Luis de Potosí 78290, Mexico.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.062. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to compare the effectiveness of conventional technologies (adsorption on activated carbon, AC, and ozonation) and technologies based on advanced oxidation processes, AOPs, (UV/H(2)O(2), O(3)/AC, O(3)/H(2)O(2)) to remove phthalates from aqueous solution (ultrapure water, surface water and wastewater). Diethyl phthalate (DEP) was chosen as a model pollutant because of its high water solubility (1,080 mg/L at 293 K) and toxicity. The activated carbons showed a high adsorption capacity to adsorb DEP in aqueous solution (up to 858 mg/g), besides the adsorption mechanism of DEP on activated carbon is governed by dispersive interactions between π electrons of its aromatic ring with π electrons of the carbon graphene planes. The photodegration process showed that the pH solution does not significantly affect the degradation kinetics of DEP and the first-order kinetic model satisfactorily fitted the experimental data. It was observed that the rate of decomposition of DEP with the O(3)/H(2)O(2) and O(3)/AC systems is faster than that with only O(3). The technologies based on AOPs (UV/H(2)O(2), O(3)/H(2)O(2), O(3)/AC) significantly improve the degradation of DEP compared to conventional technologies (O(3), UV). AC adsorption, UV/H(2)O(2), O(3)/H(2)O(2), and O(3)/AC showed a high yield to remove DEP; however, the disadvantage of AC adsorption is its much longer time to reach maximum removal. The best system to treat water (ultrapure and natural) polluted with DEP is the O(3)/AC one since it achieved the highest DEP degradation and TOC removal, as well as the lower water toxicity.

摘要

本工作旨在比较传统技术(活性炭吸附、臭氧氧化)和基于高级氧化工艺(UV/H(2)O(2)、O(3)/AC、O(3)/H(2)O(2))的技术在去除水溶液(超纯水、地表水和废水)中邻苯二甲酸酯的效果。选择邻苯二甲酸二乙酯 (DEP) 作为模型污染物,因为它具有高水溶性(293 K 时为 1,080 mg/L)和毒性。活性炭对水溶液中 DEP 的吸附能力很高(高达 858 mg/g),此外,DEP 在活性炭上的吸附机制受其芳环的π电子与石墨烯平面的π电子之间的分散相互作用控制。光降解过程表明,溶液 pH 值对 DEP 的降解动力学没有显著影响,一级动力学模型很好地拟合了实验数据。观察到 O(3)/H(2)O(2)和 O(3)/AC 系统中 DEP 的分解速率比仅使用 O(3)时更快。与传统技术(O(3)、UV)相比,基于 AOPs(UV/H(2)O(2)、O(3)/H(2)O(2)、O(3)/AC)的技术显著提高了 DEP 的降解效率。AC 吸附、UV/H(2)O(2)、O(3)/H(2)O(2)和 O(3)/AC 对去除 DEP 具有较高的产率;然而,AC 吸附的缺点是达到最大去除率所需的时间较长。处理 DEP 污染的水(超纯水和天然水)的最佳系统是 O(3)/AC 系统,因为它实现了最高的 DEP 降解和 TOC 去除率,以及较低的水毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验