Suppr超能文献

“良好的母性”还是“良好的公民性”?

"Good mothering" or "good citizenship"?

机构信息

Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine (VELiM), Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown 2006, Australia.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2012 Mar;9(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s11673-011-9343-x. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood banking is one of many biomedical innovations that confront pregnant women with new choices about what they should do to secure their own and their child's best interests. Many mothers can now choose to donate their baby's umbilical cord blood (UCB) to a public cord blood bank or pay to store it in a private cord blood bank. Donation to a public bank is widely regarded as an altruistic act of civic responsibility. Paying to store UCB may be regarded as a "unique opportunity" to provide "insurance" for the child's future. This paper reports findings from a survey of Australian women that investigated the decision to either donate or store UCB. We conclude that mothers are faced with competing discourses that force them to choose between being a "good mother" and fulfilling their role as a "good citizen." We discuss this finding with reference to the concept of value pluralism.

摘要

脐带血库是众多生物医学创新之一,它让孕妇面临着新的选择,即她们应该做些什么来确保自己和孩子的最大利益。现在,许多母亲可以选择将婴儿的脐带血 (UCB) 捐赠给公共脐带血库,或者付费将其存储在私人脐带血库中。捐赠给公共血库被广泛视为一种公民责任的利他行为。付费存储 UCB 可能被视为为孩子的未来提供“保险”的“独特机会”。本文报告了一项针对澳大利亚女性的调查结果,该调查研究了她们对捐赠或存储 UCB 的决定。我们的结论是,母亲们面临着相互竞争的话语,迫使她们在做“好母亲”和履行“好公民”角色之间做出选择。我们参考价值多元化的概念讨论了这一发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验