• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线索特异性抑制训练对重度社交饮酒者饮酒量的影响。

The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;21(1):8-16. doi: 10.1037/a0030683. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1037/a0030683
PMID:23181512
Abstract

Training social drinkers to exercise motor inhibitory control leads to a reduction in alcohol consumption. However, it is unclear if participants should attempt to exercise inhibitory control in the presence of alcohol-related cues or if nonspecific inhibition training is equally effective. It is also unclear if comparable effects can be demonstrated by training oculomotor inhibitory control. We trained motor inhibition in the context of a modified stop-signal task (experiment 1) and oculomotor inhibition in the context of a modified antisaccade task (experiment 2) before investigating the influence of these manipulations on alcohol consumption. Results from experiment 1 demonstrated that training motor inhibition in the presence of alcohol-related cues led to reduced ad libitum alcohol consumption in the laboratory but not self-reported drinking in the week after training. These effects were seen in contrast to a control group that received no inhibition training and another control group that was trained to inhibit only in the presence of neutral cues; alcohol consumption did not differ between the latter two groups. In experiment 2, training of oculomotor inhibition in the presence of alcohol-related cues led to slowed eye movements toward target cues on catch trials, but it did not influence the proportion of inhibitory failures and had no influence on alcohol consumption in the laboratory. We conclude that training participants to exercise inhibitory control in the presence of alcohol-related cues can reduce alcohol consumption, but the effects are transient and are only seen when motor, but not oculomotor, inhibition is trained.

摘要

训练社交饮酒者进行运动抑制控制会导致饮酒量减少。然而,目前尚不清楚参与者是否应该在存在与酒精相关的线索的情况下尝试进行抑制控制,或者非特定的抑制训练是否同样有效。同样不清楚是否可以通过训练眼动抑制控制来证明类似的效果。我们在修改后的停止信号任务(实验 1)的背景下训练运动抑制,在修改后的反向眼动任务(实验 2)的背景下训练眼动抑制,然后调查这些操作对饮酒的影响。实验 1 的结果表明,在存在与酒精相关的线索的情况下进行运动抑制训练会导致实验室中自由饮酒量减少,但不会导致训练后一周内的自我报告饮酒量减少。与未接受抑制训练的对照组和仅在中性线索存在下接受抑制训练的另一个对照组相比,这些效果明显;后两组之间的饮酒量没有差异。在实验 2 中,在存在与酒精相关的线索的情况下进行眼动抑制训练会导致在捕获试验中眼睛运动朝向目标线索的速度减慢,但不会影响抑制失败的比例,也不会影响实验室中的饮酒量。我们得出结论,训练参与者在存在与酒精相关的线索的情况下进行抑制控制可以减少饮酒量,但效果是短暂的,只有在训练运动抑制而不是眼动抑制时才会出现。

相似文献

1
The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers.线索特异性抑制训练对重度社交饮酒者饮酒量的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;21(1):8-16. doi: 10.1037/a0030683. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
2
Can't stop the craving: the effect of impulsivity on cue-elicited craving for alcohol in heavy and light social drinkers.无法抑制的渴望:冲动性对重度和轻度社交饮酒者酒精线索诱发渴望的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2240-5. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
3
Alcohol-related and negatively valenced cues increase motor and oculomotor disinhibition in social drinkers.与酒精相关且带有负性情绪的线索会增加社交饮酒者的运动和动眼抑制解除。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Apr;23(2):122-9. doi: 10.1037/pha0000011. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
4
Elevated alcohol consumption following alcohol cue exposure is partially mediated by reduced inhibitory control and increased craving.酒精线索暴露后饮酒量增加部分是由抑制控制能力降低和渴望增加介导的。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Oct;234(19):2979-2988. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4694-6. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Cue avoidance training and inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption: a comparison of effectiveness and investigation of their mechanisms of action.用于减少酒精摄入量的线索回避训练和抑制控制训练:有效性比较及其作用机制研究
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Aug;234(16):2489-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4639-0. Epub 2017 May 27.
6
Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?酒精线索抑制控制训练能否在情境转换中幸存下来?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;34(7):783-792. doi: 10.1037/adb0000580. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
The effect of alcohol cue exposure and acute intoxication on inhibitory control processes and ad libitum alcohol consumption.酒精线索暴露和急性醉酒对抑制控制过程和随意饮酒的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Jul;236(7):2187-2199. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05212-4. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
A randomized controlled trial of inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers.一项关于抑制控制训练对减少问题饮酒者饮酒量的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):991-1004. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000312.
9
Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers.酗酒者对酒精线索的快速趋近反应。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;39(3):209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
10
Acute stress increases ad-libitum alcohol consumption in heavy drinkers, but not through impaired inhibitory control.急性应激会增加酗酒者的随意饮酒量,但并非通过损害抑制控制来实现。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(7):1227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4205-1. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the relationship between cannabis use and drinking levels on co-use days.研究在同时使用大麻和酒精的日子里,大麻使用与饮酒量之间的关系。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1111/acer.70107.
2
Stimulus variability improves generalization following response inhibition training.刺激变异性可提高反应抑制训练后的泛化能力。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):786-802. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01913-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Why doesn't executive function training improve academic achievement? Rethinking individual differences, relevance, and engagement from a contextual framework.
为什么执行功能训练不能提高学业成绩?从情境框架重新思考个体差异、相关性和参与度。
J Cogn Dev. 2023;24(2):241-259. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2160723. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
4
Underlying mechanisms in the relationship between stress and alcohol consumption in regular and risky drinkers (MESA): methods and design of a randomized laboratory study.压力与习惯性饮酒者和风险饮酒者饮酒行为之间关系的潜在机制(MESA):一项随机实验室研究的方法和设计。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Oct 15;10(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00942-1.
5
Pilot testing of an adaptive, individualized inhibitory control training for binge drinking: first evidence on feasibility, acceptance, and efficacy.一项针对 binge drinking 的自适应个体化抑制控制训练的初步试验:关于可行性、可接受性和疗效的初步证据。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1267-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01725-4. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
Eye Tracking Studies Exploring Cognitive and Affective Processes among Alcohol Drinkers: a Systematic Review and Perspectives.眼动追踪研究探索饮酒者的认知和情感过程:系统评价与展望。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021 Mar;31(1):167-201. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09458-0. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
7
Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?酒精线索抑制控制训练能否在情境转换中幸存下来?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;34(7):783-792. doi: 10.1037/adb0000580. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Alcohol-Specific Computerized Interventions to Alter Cognitive Biases: A Systematic Review of Effects on Experimental Tasks, Drinking Behavior, and Neuronal Activation.针对改变认知偏差的酒精特定计算机化干预措施:对实验任务、饮酒行为和神经元激活影响的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 9;10:871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00871. eCollection 2019.
9
Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder.激励敏感化作为通向酒精使用障碍的途径的证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:897-926. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Instructed and Acquired Contingencies in Response-Inhibition Tasks.反应抑制任务中的指令性和习得性应急情况。
J Cogn. 2019 Feb 4;2(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.53.