Econpubblica, Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;14(6):959-69. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0442-3. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
The generic reference price (GRP) was introduced in Italy in 2001. The main purpose of this paper is: (a) producing evidence regarding the effect of GRP on prices; (b) testing the hypothesis that there is a reallocation of demand from the genericated (and reference-priced) molecules to patent-protected products that have the same therapeutic indication.
The analysis used a unique dataset of quantities and revenues of six therapeutic groups that were observed for more than a decade. Difference-in-differences analysis is applied. Prices are adjusted for all the regulatory interventions in the ten years of observations, to control for confounding impact of these interventions.
On average, prices dropped 13% more in groups to which GRP was applied than in other groups. Moreover, each entry of a new generic was associated with a price drop of around 2.8%. On the other hand, GRP did not induce any significant switching towards in-patent molecules.
We provide the first empirical results of the impact of GRP on prices in Italy and evidence that GRP cannot be held solely responsible for the often reported demand reallocation towards new and in-patent molecules.
通用参考价格(GRP)于 2001 年在意大利推出。本文主要目的是:(a)提供关于 GRP 对价格影响的证据;(b)检验从已通用(和已定价)分子向具有相同治疗指征的受专利保护产品重新分配需求的假设。
该分析使用了一个独特的数据集,该数据集观察了六个治疗组的十多年的数量和收入。应用了差异中的差异分析。为了控制这些干预措施的混杂影响,对十年观察期内的所有监管干预措施进行了价格调整。
平均而言,在应用 GRP 的组中,价格下降了 13%以上,而在其他组中,价格下降了 13%以上。此外,每推出一种新的仿制药,价格就会下降约 2.8%。另一方面,GRP 并没有引起任何向专利内分子的显著转移。
我们提供了意大利 GRP 对价格影响的第一个经验结果,并证明 GRP 不能完全归咎于经常报道的向新的和专利内分子重新分配需求。