Nayroles Gabrielle, Frybourg Sandrine, Gabriel Sylvie, Kornfeld Åsa, Antoñanzas-Villar Fernando, Espín Jaime, Jommi Claudio, Martini Nello, de Pouvourville Gérard, Tolley Keith, Wasem Jürgen, Toumi Mondher
Global Market Access and Pricing, IPSEN Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Pricing, Reimbursement and Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 May 12;5(1):1298190. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1298190. eCollection 2017.
: Many established products (EPs - marketed for eight years or more) are widely used off-label despite little evidence on benefit-risk ratio. This exposes patients to risks related to safety and lack of efficacy, and healthcare providers to liability. Introducing new indications for EPs may represent a high societal value; however, manufacturers rarely invest in R&D for EPs. The objective of this research was to describe incentives and disincentives for developing new indications for EPs in Europe and to investigate consequences of current policies. : Targeted literature search and expert panel meetings. : Within the current European-level and national-level regulatory framework there are limited incentives for development of new indications with EPs. Extension of indication normally does not allow the price to be increased or maintained, the market protection period to be extended, or exclusion from a reference price system. New indication frequently triggers re-evaluation, resulting in price erosion, regardless of the level of added value with the new indication. In consequence, manufacturers are more prone to undertake R&D efforts at early to mid-stage of product life cycle rather than with EPs, or to invest in new chemical entities, even in therapeutic areas with broad off-label use. This represents a potentially missed opportunity as developing new indications for EPs offers an alternative to off-label use or lengthy and expensive R&D for new therapies, opens new opportunities for potentially cost-effective treatment alternatives, as well as greater equity in patients' access to treatment options. : There are potential benefits from the development of new indications for EPs that are currently not being realized due to a lack of regulatory and pricing incentives in Europe. Incentives for orphan or paediatric drugs have proven to be effective in promoting R&D. Similarly, incentives to promote R&D in EPs should be developed, for the benefit of patients and healthcare systems.
许多已上市产品(上市八年及以上的成熟产品)尽管几乎没有关于效益风险比的证据,但仍被广泛用于说明书以外的用途。这使患者面临与安全性和疗效不足相关的风险,也使医疗服务提供者面临责任风险。为成熟产品引入新适应症可能具有很高的社会价值;然而,制造商很少对成熟产品进行研发投资。本研究的目的是描述欧洲为成熟产品开发新适应症的激励因素和抑制因素,并调查现行政策的后果。:针对性文献检索和专家小组会议。:在当前欧洲层面和国家层面的监管框架内,对成熟产品开发新适应症的激励有限。适应症的扩展通常不允许提高或维持价格、延长市场保护期或排除在参考价格体系之外。新适应症经常引发重新评估,导致价格下降,无论新适应症的附加值水平如何。因此,制造商更倾向于在产品生命周期的早期到中期进行研发,而不是针对成熟产品,或者投资于新的化学实体,即使在广泛存在说明书以外使用情况的治疗领域也是如此。这代表了一个潜在的错失机会,因为为成熟产品开发新适应症为说明书以外的使用提供了替代方案,或者为新疗法提供了漫长而昂贵的研发替代方案,为潜在的具有成本效益的治疗替代方案开辟了新机会,同时也提高了患者获得治疗选择的公平性。:为成熟产品开发新适应症存在潜在益处,但由于欧洲缺乏监管和定价激励措施,目前这些益处尚未实现。孤儿药或儿科药物的激励措施已被证明在促进研发方面是有效的。同样,应该制定激励措施来促进成熟产品的研发,以造福患者和医疗系统。