Suppr超能文献

螺内酯和氨氯地平对南印度 2 型糖尿病患者噻唑烷二酮类诱导的液体潴留的影响。

Effect of spironolactone and amiloride on thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention in South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Diabetes, M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Prof M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;8(2):225-32. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06330612. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) induce renal epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)-mediated sodium reabsorption, resulting in plasma volume (PV) expansion. Incidence and long-term management of fluid retention induced by thiazolidinediones remain unclear.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a 4-week run-in period, rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, was added to a background anti-diabetic therapy in 260 South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with PV expansion (absolute reduction in hematocrit in run-in, ≥1.5 percentage points) entered a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate effects of amiloride and spironolactone on attenuating rosiglitazone-induced fluid retention. Primary endpoint was change in hematocrit in each diuretic group versus placebo (control group).

RESULTS

Of the 260 patients, 70% (n=180) had PV expansion. These 180 patients (70% male; mean age, 47.8 years [range, 30-80 years]) were randomly assigned to rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus spironolactone, 50 mg once daily; rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus amiloride, 10 mg once daily; or rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus placebo for 24 weeks. Hematocrit continued to decrease significantly in control and spironolactone groups (mean absolute change, -1.2 [P=0.01] and -0.7 [P=0.02] percentage points, respectively), suggesting continued PV expansion. No change occurred with amiloride (mean change, 0.0 percentage points). Amiloride, but not spironolactone, was superior to control (mean hematocrit difference [95% confidence interval] relative to control, 1.27 [0.21-2.55] and 0.49 [-0.79-1.77] percentage points [P=0.04 and P=0.61], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of rosiglitazone-induced fluid retention in South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes is high. Amiloride, a direct ENaC blocker, but not spironolactone, prevented protracted fluid retention in these patients.

摘要

背景与目的

噻唑烷二酮类药物(吡格列酮和罗格列酮)可诱导肾脏上皮钠通道(ENaC)介导的钠重吸收,导致血容量(PV)扩张。噻唑烷二酮类药物引起的液体潴留的发生率和长期管理仍不清楚。

设计、地点、参与者和测量:在 4 周的导入期内,罗格列酮,每日两次,每次 4 毫克,加入 260 名南印度 2 型糖尿病患者的背景抗糖尿病治疗中。PV 扩张的患者(导入期内绝对红细胞压积下降≥1.5 个百分点)进入一项随机、安慰剂对照研究,以评估阿米洛利和螺内酯对减轻罗格列酮引起的液体潴留的影响。主要终点是每个利尿剂组与安慰剂(对照组)相比红细胞压积的变化。

结果

在 260 名患者中,70%(n=180)有 PV 扩张。这 180 名患者(70%为男性;平均年龄 47.8 岁[范围 30-80 岁])被随机分配到罗格列酮,每日两次,每次 4 毫克,加螺内酯,每日一次,50 毫克;罗格列酮,每日两次,每次 4 毫克,加阿米洛利,每日一次,10 毫克;或罗格列酮,每日两次,每次 4 毫克,加安慰剂,持续 24 周。在对照组和螺内酯组,红细胞压积继续显著下降(平均绝对变化分别为-1.2[P=0.01]和-0.7[P=0.02]个百分点),表明持续的 PV 扩张。阿米洛利组没有变化(平均变化 0.0 个百分点)。与对照组相比,阿米洛利(相对红细胞压积差异的平均变化[95%置信区间])优于对照组,分别为 1.27[0.21-2.55]和 0.49[-0.79-1.77]个百分点(P=0.04 和 P=0.61)。

结论

在南印度 2 型糖尿病患者中,罗格列酮诱导的液体潴留发生率很高。直接作用于 ENaC 的阿米洛利,但不是螺内酯,可预防这些患者的长期液体潴留。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Revisiting the rosiglitazone story--lessons learned.重温罗格列酮事件——汲取的教训。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):803-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1008233. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验