Wijngaard P L, Gimpel J A, Schuurman H J, van der Meulen A, Gmelig Meyling F H, Jambroes G
Heart Transplantation Centre, Utrecht, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Pathol. 1990 Feb;43(2):137-42. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.2.137.
Cytoimmunological monitoring and quantitative birefringence measurements were used as potential aids in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation instead of histopathological assessment of the endomyocardial biopsy specimen alone. Cytoimmunological monitoring was based on morphological inspection and quantitation of mononuclear cells, particularly activated lymphoid cells. Quantitative birefringence measurements comprise a variable for myocyte contractile function. Its read out is the ratio of the degree of birefringence before contraction to that after. Cytoimmunological monitoring indicated significantly higher concentrations of activated lymphocytes in moderate or severe acute rejection, and quantitative birefringence measurements indicated decreased myocyte function during severe and resolved or resolving rejection. Cytoimmunological monitoring and quantitative birefringence measurements were diagnostically most useful in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value, when only data gathered before the first episode of acute rejection were considered. For cytoimmunological monitoring, diagnostic relevance was optimal when the data were expressed as relative proportions of activated lymphocytes. The quantitative birefringence measurements correlated best with analysis of the endomyocardial biopsy specimen when a cut off value of 1.25 was used. When both methods for diagnosing acute rejection were analysed together, no improvement in sensitivity (value 0.44) was found, but the specificity increased to 0.98 and the predictive value to about 0.80. It is concluded that cytoimmunological monitoring is a useful, non-invasive additional method for diagnosing the first period of acute rejection after heart transplantation and that quantitative birefringence measurements give valuable information on the extent of myocyte damage.
细胞免疫监测和定量双折射测量被用作心脏移植后诊断急性排斥反应的潜在辅助手段,而不是仅依靠心内膜活检标本的组织病理学评估。细胞免疫监测基于对单核细胞,特别是活化淋巴细胞的形态学检查和定量分析。定量双折射测量包括一个反映心肌细胞收缩功能的变量。其读数是收缩前双折射程度与收缩后双折射程度的比值。细胞免疫监测显示,在中度或重度急性排斥反应中活化淋巴细胞浓度显著升高,定量双折射测量表明在重度及已缓解或正在缓解的排斥反应期间心肌细胞功能下降。当仅考虑首次急性排斥反应发作前收集的数据时,细胞免疫监测和定量双折射测量在敏感性、特异性和预测价值方面在诊断上最为有用。对于细胞免疫监测,当数据以活化淋巴细胞的相对比例表示时,诊断相关性最佳。当使用截断值1.25时,定量双折射测量与心内膜活检标本分析的相关性最佳。当将两种诊断急性排斥反应的方法一起分析时,未发现敏感性提高(值为0.44),但特异性提高到0.98,预测价值提高到约0.80。得出的结论是,细胞免疫监测是诊断心脏移植后急性排斥反应初期的一种有用的、非侵入性的辅助方法,定量双折射测量可提供有关心肌细胞损伤程度的有价值信息。