Suppr超能文献

验证四点摄影量表评估中面部容量缺失和/或轮廓缺陷的方法。

Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency.

机构信息

New York and Mount Kisco, N.Y.; Scottsdale, Ariz.; and San Diego, Calif. From the Lorenc Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Center; The Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic, and Laser Surgery; Kane Plastic Surgery; Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation; and Dermatology and Consulting.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue augmentation with injectable fillers is commonly performed in the malar area. A four-point scale, the Medicis Midface Volume Scale, was developed and validated as an objective measure of the severity of midface volume loss.

METHODS

Using a separate photographic guide, four investigators rated photographs (front and right and left sides, to provide a full view of the face) of 60 untreated subjects in random order during two sessions 2 or more weeks apart. Both sides of the midface were scored separately as follows: 1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing.

RESULTS

Most subjects (mean age, 45.7 years; range, 23 to 80 years) were women (72 percent) and white (87 percent). Intraobserver agreement between sessions was "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.918; 95 percent CI, 0.887 to 0.949) and left (0.911; 95 percent CI, 0.878 to 0.943) sides. Intraobserver exact agreement between sessions was 87.1 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the right side and 86.3 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the left. Interobserver agreement was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.759 to 0.893) and left (0.758 to 0.888) sides. Interobserver exact agreement was 72.5 to 87.5 percent for the right side and 72.5 to 86.7 percent for the left. Overall, results were similar in nonwhite and white subjects.

CONCLUSION

Consistent agreement by different evaluators and the same evaluator at different times validates the four-point Medicis Midface Volume Scale as suitable to objectively measure the severity of midface volume loss.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

摘要

背景

软组织填充剂注射在面颊区域广泛应用。Medicis 中面部容量量表是一种四点量表,被开发并验证为中面部容量损失严重程度的客观测量方法。

方法

使用单独的照片指南,四位研究者在两次相隔至少两周的会议上,随机对 60 名未经治疗的受试者的照片(正面和右侧、左侧,以提供全面的面部视图)进行评分。中面部的两侧分别评分如下:1、相当饱满;2、轻度饱满度损失;3、中度损失,轻微凹陷;4、大量损失,明显凹陷。

结果

大多数受试者(平均年龄 45.7 岁;范围 23 至 80 岁)为女性(72%)和白人(87%)。两次会议之间的观察者内一致性为“几乎完美”(加权 κ 评分),右侧为 0.918(95%置信区间,0.887 至 0.949),左侧为 0.911(95%置信区间,0.878 至 0.943)。两次会议之间观察者内完全一致的比例为 87.1%(范围为 76.7%至 95.0%),右侧为 86.3%(范围为 76.7%至 95.0%)。观察者间一致性为“中度”至“几乎完美”(加权 κ 评分),右侧为 0.759 至 0.893,左侧为 0.758 至 0.888。右侧观察者间完全一致的比例为 72.5%至 87.5%,左侧为 72.5%至 86.7%。总体而言,非白人和白人受试者的结果相似。

结论

不同评估者之间以及同一评估者在不同时间的一致意见验证了四点 Medicis 中面部容量量表适合客观测量中面部容量损失的严重程度。

临床问题/证据水平:诊断 IV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验