Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Global Health. 2012 Nov 28;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-40.
While sustainability of health programmes has been the subject of empirical studies, there is little evidence specifically on the sustainability of Community Based Organisations (CBOs) for HIV/AIDS. Debates around optimal approaches in community health have centred on utilitarian versus empowerment approaches. This paper, using the World Bank Multi-Country AIDS Program (MAP) in Zambia as a case study, seeks to evaluate whether or not this global programme contributed to the sustainability of CBOs working in the area of HIV/AIDS in Zambia. Lessons for optimising sustainability of CBOs in lower income countries are drawn.
In-depth interviews with representatives of all CBOs that received CRAIDS funding (n = 18) and district stakeholders (n= 10) in Mumbwa rural district in Zambia, in 2010; and national stakeholders (n=6) in 2011.
All eighteen CBOs in Mumbwa that received MAP funding between 2003 and 2008 had existed prior to receiving MAP grants, some from as early as 1992. This was contrary to national level perceptions that CBOs were established to access funds rather than from the needs of communities. FUNDING opportunities for CBOs in Mumbwa in 2010 were scarce.Health services: While all CBOs were functioning in 2010, most reported reductions in service provision. Home visits had reduced due to a shortage of food to bring to people living with HIV/AIDS and scarcity of funding for transport, which reduced antiretroviral treatment adherence support and transport of patients to clinics.Organisational capacity and viability: Sustainability had been promoted during MAP through funding Income Generating Activities. However, there was a lack of infrastructure and training to make these sustainable. Links between health facilities and communities improved over time, however volunteers' skills levels had reduced.
Whilst the World Bank espoused the idea of sustainability in their plans, it remained on the periphery of their Zambia strategy. Assessments of need on the ground and accurate costings for sustainable service delivery, building on existing community strengths, are needed before projects commence. This study highlights the importance of enabling and building the capacity of existing CBOs and community structures, rather than creating new mechanisms.
虽然卫生项目的可持续性一直是实证研究的主题,但专门针对社区组织(CBO)在艾滋病毒/艾滋病方面的可持续性的证据很少。关于社区卫生的最佳方法的争论集中在功利主义和赋权方法上。本文以世界银行多国家艾滋病方案(MAP)在赞比亚的项目为例,试图评估该全球方案是否有助于赞比亚艾滋病领域的 CBO 的可持续性。本文还汲取了优化低收入国家 CBO 可持续性的经验教训。
对赞比亚姆万布瓦农村地区所有接受 CRAIDS 供资的 CBO 代表(n=18)和地区利益攸关方(n=10),以及 2011 年全国利益攸关方(n=6)进行深入访谈。所有接受 2003 年至 2008 年期间 MAP 供资的姆万布瓦的 18 个 CBO 在获得 MAP 赠款之前就已经存在,有些 CBO 早在 1992 年就已经存在。这与国家一级的看法相反,即 CBO 是为了获得资金而不是为了满足社区的需要而成立的。2010 年,姆万布瓦 CBO 的供资机会很少。卫生服务:虽然所有 CBO 在 2010 年都在运作,但大多数报告服务提供减少。由于缺乏为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供食物,以及缺乏交通资金,家访减少了,这减少了抗逆转录病毒治疗的坚持支持和患者到诊所的交通。组织能力和生存能力:通过资助创收活动,MAP 推动了可持续性。然而,缺乏基础设施和培训来实现可持续性。随着时间的推移,卫生设施与社区之间的联系得到改善,但志愿者的技能水平下降。
虽然世界银行在其计划中提出了可持续性的想法,但在其赞比亚战略中,这一想法仍处于边缘地位。在项目启动之前,需要对当地的需求进行评估,并对可持续服务提供进行准确的成本核算,以利用现有社区的优势。本研究强调了赋权和建设现有 CBO 和社区结构的能力的重要性,而不是创建新的机制。