• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔黏膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐用于战场院前疼痛控制的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.

机构信息

US Army Austere and Wilderness Medicine Fellowship, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6 Suppl 5):S490-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754674.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754674
PMID:23192075
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute pain, resulting from trauma and other causes, is a common condition that imposes a need for prehospital analgesia on and off the battlefield. The narcotic most frequently used for prehospital analgesia on the battlefield during the past century has been morphine. Intramuscular morphine has a delayed onset of pain relief that is suboptimal and difficult to titrate. Although intravenously administered morphine can readily provide rapid and effective prehospital analgesia, oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a safe alternative that does not require intravenous access. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of OTFC in the prehospital battlefield environment.

METHODS

Data collected during combat deployments (Afghanistan and Iraq) from March 15, 2003, to March 31, 2010, were analyzed. Patients were US Army Special Operations Command casualties. Patients receiving OTFC for acute pain were evaluated. Pretreatment and posttreatment pain intensities were quantified by the verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. OTFC adverse effects and injuries treated were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients were administered OTFC, of whom 197 had NRS pain evaluations conducted before and approximately 15 minutes to 30 minutes following treatment. The difference between NRS pain scores at 0 minutes (NRS, 8.0 [1.4]) and 15 minutes to 30 minutes (NRS, 3.2 [2.1]) was significant (p < 0.001). Only 18.3% (36 of 197) of patients were also administered other types of analgesics. Nausea was the most common adverse effect as reported by 12.7% (25 of 197) of patients. The only major adverse effect occurred in the patient who received the largest opioid dose, 3,200-µg OTFC and 20-mg morphine. This patient exhibited hypoventilation and saturation of less than 90% requiring low-dose naloxone.

CONCLUSION

OTFC is a rapid and noninvasive pain management strategy that provides safe and effective analgesia in the prehospital battlefield setting. OTFC has considerable implications for use in civilian prehospital and austere environments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

摘要

背景

创伤和其他原因引起的急性疼痛是一种常见病症,需要在战场内外进行院前镇痛。在过去一个世纪中,在战场上用于院前镇痛的最常用的麻醉剂是吗啡。肌肉注射吗啡的止痛效果延迟,且效果不理想,难以滴定。虽然静脉内给予吗啡可以迅速有效地提供院前镇痛,但口服粘膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐(OTFC)是一种安全的替代方法,不需要静脉通路。本研究评估了 OTFC 在院前战场环境中的安全性和有效性。

方法

分析了 2003 年 3 月 15 日至 2010 年 3 月 31 日期间在战斗部署期间(阿富汗和伊拉克)收集的数据。患者是美国陆军特种作战司令部的伤员。评估了接受 OTFC 治疗急性疼痛的患者。通过数字评分量表(NRS)从 0 到 10 量化治疗前和治疗后 15 分钟至 30 分钟的疼痛强度。还评估了 OTFC 的不良反应和治疗的损伤。

结果

共有 286 名患者接受了 OTFC 治疗,其中 197 名患者进行了 NRS 疼痛评估,在治疗前和治疗后 15 分钟至 30 分钟进行了评估。0 分钟(NRS,8.0 [1.4])和 15 分钟至 30 分钟(NRS,3.2 [2.1])之间的 NRS 疼痛评分差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。只有 18.3%(197 名患者中的 36 名)的患者还接受了其他类型的镇痛药。报告有 12.7%(197 名患者中的 25 名)的患者出现恶心等最常见的不良反应。唯一的主要不良反应发生在接受最大阿片类药物剂量的患者身上,即 3200μgOTFC 和 20mg 吗啡。该患者出现呼吸不足和饱和度低于 90%,需要低剂量纳洛酮。

结论

OTFC 是一种快速、非侵入性的疼痛管理策略,可在院前战场环境中提供安全有效的镇痛。OTFC 在民用院前和恶劣环境中具有广泛的应用意义。

证据水平

治疗研究,四级。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.口腔黏膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐用于战场院前疼痛控制的安全性和有效性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6 Suppl 5):S490-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754674.
2
A randomized clinical trial of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus intravenous morphine sulfate for initial control of pain in children with extremity injuries.口服枸橼酸芬太尼与静脉注射硫酸吗啡用于儿童四肢损伤疼痛初始控制的随机临床试验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Aug;23(8):544-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318128f80b.
3
A comparison of intranasal fentanyl spray with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.鼻内芬太尼喷雾剂与口服枸橼酸芬太尼透粘膜剂治疗癌症突破性疼痛的比较:一项开放标签、随机、交叉试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2805-15. doi: 10.1185/03007990903336135.
4
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: a controlled dose titration study.口服黏膜用枸橼酸芬太尼(OTFC)治疗癌症患者爆发性疼痛:一项剂量对照滴定研究。
Pain. 1999 Feb;79(2-3):303-12. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00179-1.
5
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of migraine headache pain in outpatients: a case series.口腔黏膜枸橼酸芬太尼用于门诊偏头痛疼痛治疗:病例系列
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):762-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04142.x.
6
Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healthy adult volunteers.芬太尼泡腾颊片(FEBT)1080微克与口腔黏膜枸橼酸芬太尼1600微克的相对生物利用度以及FEBT 270至1300微克的剂量比例:一项在健康成年志愿者中进行的单剂量、随机、开放标签、三周期研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.016.
7
The relative potency of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate compared with intravenous morphine in the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain.枸橼酸芬太尼口腔黏膜给药与静脉注射吗啡相比在治疗中重度术后疼痛方面的相对效价。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):732-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00038.
8
Trends in Prehospital Analgesia Administration by US Forces From 2007 Through 2016.2007年至2016年美国军队院前镇痛给药趋势
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):271-276. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489022. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
9
Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.健康志愿者中单剂量芬太尼舌下喷雾和口服黏膜用枸橼酸芬太尼的药代动力学:一项随机交叉研究。
Clin Ther. 2013 Mar;35(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.017.
10
Analysis of the paramedic administration of fentanyl.护理人员使用芬太尼的情况分析。
J Opioid Manag. 2011 May-Jun;7(3):229-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Methoxyflurane in early analgesic therapy by ski patrol members on Swiss ski slopes - an observational cohort study.瑞士滑雪坡上滑雪巡逻队员早期使用甲氧氟烷进行镇痛治疗的观察性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 18;32(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01308-9.
2
Parenteral, Non-Intravenous Analgesia in Acute Traumatic Pain-A Narrative Review Based on a Systematic Literature Search.急性创伤性疼痛的非静脉注射肠外镇痛——基于系统文献检索的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2560. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092560.
3
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate analgesia in prehospital trauma care: an observational cohort study.
口腔黏膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐镇痛在院前创伤救护中的应用:一项观察性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 7;31(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01066-0.
4
Improving ambulance care for children suffering acute pain: a qualitative interview study.提高救护车对急性疼痛儿童的护理水平:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00648-y.
5
Pilot implementation of the competence of Czech paramedics to administer sufentanil for the treatment of pain in acute trauma without consulting a physician: observational study.捷克急救医务人员在无需咨询医师的情况下使用舒芬太尼治疗急性创伤疼痛的能力的初步实施:观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00622-8.
6
Nasal nalbuphine analgesia in prehospital trauma managed by first-responder personnel on ski slopes in Switzerland: an observational cohort study.瑞士滑雪道上由第一响应人员管理的创伤前鼻内纳布啡镇痛:一项观察性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 17;29(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00852-y.
7
Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.芬太尼制剂在疼痛管理中的应用:更新。
Drugs. 2017 May;77(7):747-763. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0727-z.
8
Is intramuscular morphine satisfying frontline medical personnels' requirement for battlefield analgesia in Helmand Province, Afghanistan? A questionnaire study.肌内注射吗啡能否满足阿富汗赫尔曼德省前线医务人员对战场镇痛的需求?一项问卷调查研究。
Br J Pain. 2015 May;9(2):115-21. doi: 10.1177/2049463714535563.
9
A new splice of life for the μ-opioid receptor.μ-阿片受体的全新剪接形式
J Clin Invest. 2015 Jul 1;125(7):2558-61. doi: 10.1172/JCI82060. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
New drugs and devices from 2011 - 2012 that might change your practice.2011年至2012年可能改变你医疗实践的新药和新设备。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;14(6):619-28. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.2.16210.