Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):496-502. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02230-12. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
The sonication technique has been shown to be a promising tool for microbiological diagnosis of device-related infections. We evaluated the usefulness of the sonication method for pathogen detection in 80 explanted cardiac components collected from 40 patients, and the results were compared with those of conventional cultures. Forty subjects undergoing cardiac device removal were studied: 20 had cardiac device infection, and 20 subjects underwent elective generator replacement or revision in the absence of infection. Sonication of explanted devices was more sensitive than traditional culture for microbial detection (67% and 50%, respectively; P = 0.0005). The bacterial count detected in sonication fluid culture was significantly higher than that detected in traditional culture in both infected (P = 0.019) and uninfected (P = 0.029) devices. In the infected patients, sonication fluid culture yielded a significantly higher rate of pathogen detection in explanted electrodes than traditional culture (65% versus 45%; P = 0.02), while no differences were found in the generators. Ten strains were detected only through sonication fluid culture: 6 Staphylococcus epidermidis strains, 1 Staphylococcus hominis strain, 2 Corynebacterium striatum strains, and 1 Brevundimonas sp. Neither the type nor the duration of antimicrobial therapy before device removal had an effect on the diagnostic performance of sonication fluid culture (P = 0.75 and P = 0.56, respectively). In the patients without infection, sonication fluid culture was positive in 8 cases (40%), whereas conventional culture was positive in only 4 (20%). In summary, the sonication technique improves the microbiological diagnosis of explanted cardiac devices.
超声处理技术已被证明是一种很有前途的工具,可用于诊断与器械相关的感染的微生物。我们评估了超声法在 40 例患者 80 个心脏植入器械中病原体检测的实用性,将结果与传统培养法进行比较。研究了 40 例接受心脏器械移除的患者:20 例有心脏器械感染,20 例患者因无感染而行心脏器械更换或修订。与传统培养法相比,超声处理对微生物检测更敏感(分别为 67%和 50%;P=0.0005)。在感染和非感染的器械中,超声液培养检测到的细菌计数均显著高于传统培养法(均为 P=0.019 和 P=0.029)。在感染患者中,与传统培养法相比,超声液培养在感染的植入电极中病原体检测率显著更高(65%比 45%;P=0.02),而在心脏器械中则无差异。10 株仅通过超声液培养检测到:6 株表皮葡萄球菌、1 株人葡萄球菌、2 株棒状杆菌和 1 株短小棒状杆菌。在器械移除前的抗菌治疗类型和时间均不会影响超声液培养的诊断性能(P=0.75 和 P=0.56)。在无感染的患者中,8 例(40%)超声液培养阳性,而传统培养仅 4 例(20%)阳性。总之,超声处理技术提高了心脏植入器械的微生物学诊断。