• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统的咽后软组织肿胀阈值在成人创伤患者的计算机断层扫描中对颈椎损伤的检测灵敏度较差。

Traditional threshold for retropharyngeal soft-tissue swelling is poorly sensitive for the detection of cervical spine injury on computed tomography in adult trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E211-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827f0dc3.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827f0dc3
PMID:23197017
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the diagnostic value of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling in the setting of cervical spine trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In adult patients with trauma, an increase in the thickness of the retropharyngeal soft tissues is commonly used as a potential indicator of occult injury, but no studies have examined this parameter using computed tomography (CT) as a screening modality.

METHODS

A total of 541 patients with trauma with injuries at any level of the spine underwent CT. Patients with cervical injury were divided into those requiring noninvasive (observation or cervical collar, n = 142) management, and those requiring invasive (surgery or halo, n = 61) treatment. A control group of patients with isolated thoracic or lumbar injuries was used for comparison (n = 542). Retropharyngeal soft tissues were measured at the cranial and caudal endplates of all cervical levels on sagittal and axial CT. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for +1, +2, and +3 standard deviations from mean values.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for detection of injury was found to be universally poor for all measurement groups. This ranged from 14.4% to 21.2% at +1 SD to 5.3% to 8.7% at +2 SD. Positive and negative predictive values for injury were also universally poor, ranging from 38% to 75%. Soft-tissue swelling as a sentinel sign of cervical spine injury demonstrates consistently high specificity and low sensitivity, precisely the opposite of what would be desired in a screening test. This study shows at best a sensitivity of 21.6% when using this parameter for the detection of these injuries in adult patients with trauma.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the results of this study, we recommend against the routine use of measurement of the prevertebral soft tissues on CT as a screening tool for cervical spine injury in adult patients with trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

探讨颈椎创伤时椎前软组织肿胀的诊断价值。

背景资料总结

在创伤的成年患者中,咽后软组织厚度的增加通常被用作隐匿性损伤的潜在指标,但尚无研究使用计算机断层扫描(CT)作为筛查手段来检查该参数。

方法

共对 541 例脊柱各部位创伤患者行 CT 检查。颈椎损伤患者分为非侵入性(观察或颈圈,n = 142)和侵入性(手术或 halo,n = 61)治疗。同时设立单纯胸腰椎损伤患者对照组(n = 542)。在矢状位和轴位 CT 上测量所有颈椎水平的颅端和尾端终板的咽后软组织。计算+1、+2 和+3 个标准差平均值的敏感度和特异度。

结果

所有测量组对损伤的检测敏感度普遍较差。从+1 SD 的 14.4%到+2 SD 的 5.3%到+3 SD 的 8.7%。阳性和阴性预测值对损伤的评估也普遍较差,范围从 38%到 75%。作为颈椎损伤的哨兵征象,椎前软组织肿胀表现出始终较高的特异性和较低的敏感度,这与筛查试验所需的情况正好相反。本研究表明,在创伤的成年患者中,使用该参数检测这些损伤的敏感度最高为 21.6%。

结论

基于本研究的结果,我们不建议将 CT 上椎前软组织的测量常规用作创伤成年患者颈椎损伤的筛查工具。

证据等级

3 级。

相似文献

1
Traditional threshold for retropharyngeal soft-tissue swelling is poorly sensitive for the detection of cervical spine injury on computed tomography in adult trauma patients.传统的咽后软组织肿胀阈值在成人创伤患者的计算机断层扫描中对颈椎损伤的检测灵敏度较差。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E211-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827f0dc3.
2
Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan--a meta-analysis and cohort study.基于多排螺旋 CT 平扫正常的成人昏迷钝性创伤患者颈椎安全评估:一项荟萃分析和队列研究。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
3
Significance of prevertebral soft tissue measurement in cervical spine injuries.颈椎损伤中椎体前软组织测量的意义
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Jul;51(1):73-6. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00142-6.
4
Sensitivity of prevertebral soft tissue measurement of C3 for detection of cervical spine fractures and dislocations.C3椎体前方软组织测量对颈椎骨折和脱位检测的敏感性。
Am J Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;16(4):346-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(98)90124-3.
5
Cervical spinal clearance: A prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-institutional Trial.颈椎脊髓清除:一项前瞻性的西部创伤协会多机构试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Dec;81(6):1122-1130. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001194.
6
Parsing the Utility of CT and MRI in the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) System: Is CT SLIC Enough?剖析CT和MRI在下颈椎损伤分类(SLIC)系统中的效用:CT SLIC是否足够?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1292-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15492. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
7
Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal?钝性创伤所致意识不清患者不稳定型颈椎损伤的排除:当多排探测器CT检查结果正常时,是否需要进行磁共振成像检查?
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):106-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371040697.
8
Normal pediatric prevertebral soft-tissue thickness on MDCT.正常小儿颈椎前软组织 MDCT 厚度。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):W130-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6288.
9
Clinical examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury.临床检查辅以计算机断层扫描:一种识别颈椎损伤的有效方法。
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1297-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b604.
10
Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?钝性颈椎损伤的影像学清除:X线平片还是计算机断层扫描?
J Trauma. 2003 Aug;55(2):222-6; discussion 226-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000083332.93868.E2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevertebral Soft-Tissue Swelling at C7 Is Highly Sensitive for Cervical Spine Ligamentous Injury Study Type: Retrospective Cohort Study.C7 椎体前软组织肿胀对颈椎韧带损伤高度敏感 研究类型:回顾性队列研究
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Apr 1;4(4). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00093. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Safe management of acute cervical spine injuries.急性颈椎损伤的安全管理
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 May 21;3(5):347-357. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170076. eCollection 2018 May.