• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检的准确性和质量评估:单中心大型活检队列研究

Accuracy and Quality Assessment of EUS-FNA: A Single-Center Large Cohort of Biopsies.

作者信息

Bluen Benjamin Ephraim, Lachter Jesse, Khamaysi Iyad, Kamal Yassin, Malkin Leonid, Keren Ruth, Epelbaum Ron, Kluger Yoram

机构信息

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, The Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel.

出版信息

Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:139563. doi: 10.1155/2012/139563. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1155/2012/139563
PMID:23197929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3503321/
Abstract

Introduction. Thorough quality control (QC) study with systemic monitoring and evaluation is crucial to optimizing the effectiveness of EUS-FNA. Methods. Retrospective analysis was composed of investigating consecutive patient files that underwent EUS-FNA. QC specifically focused on diagnostic accuracy, impacts on preexisting diagnoses, and case management. Results. 268 patient files were evaluated. EUS-FNA cytology helped establish accurate diagnoses in 92.54% (248/268) of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 83%, 100%, 100%, 91.6%, and 94%, respectively. The most common biopsy site was the pancreas (68%). The most accurate location for EUS-FNA was the esophagus, 13/13 (100%), followed by the pancreas (89.6%). EUS-FNA was least informative for abdominal lymph nodes (70.5%). After FNA and followup, eight false negatives for tumors were found (3%), while 7.5% of samples still lacked a definitive diagnosis. Discussion. QC suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA might be improved further by (1) taking more FNA passes from suspected lesions, (2) optimizing needle selection (3) having an experienced echo-endoscopist available during the learning curve, and (4) having a cytologist present during the procedure. QC also identified remediable reporting errors. In conclusion, QC study is valuable in identifying weaknesses and thereby augmenting the effectiveness of EUS-FNA.

摘要

引言。通过系统的监测和评估进行全面的质量控制(QC)研究对于优化超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)的有效性至关重要。方法。回顾性分析包括调查连续接受EUS-FNA的患者病历。质量控制特别关注诊断准确性、对既往诊断的影响以及病例管理。结果。评估了268份患者病历。EUS-FNA细胞学检查帮助92.54%(248/268)的患者建立了准确诊断。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为83%、100%、100%、91.6%和94%。最常见的活检部位是胰腺(68%)。EUS-FNA最准确的部位是食管,13/13(100%),其次是胰腺(89.6%)。EUS-FNA对腹部淋巴结的诊断价值最低(70.5%)。在FNA和随访后,发现8例假阴性肿瘤病例(3%),而7.5%的样本仍缺乏明确诊断。讨论。质量控制表明,通过以下方式可能进一步提高EUS-FNA的诊断准确性:(1)从可疑病变处多取几次FNA穿刺样本;(2)优化针具选择;(3)在学习曲线期间配备经验丰富的超声内镜医师;(4)在操作过程中有细胞病理学家在场。质量控制还发现了可纠正的报告错误。总之,质量控制研究对于识别薄弱环节从而提高EUS-FNA的有效性具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bd/3503321/743d5b0de2e6/DTE2012-139563.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bd/3503321/373685983a72/DTE2012-139563.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bd/3503321/743d5b0de2e6/DTE2012-139563.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bd/3503321/373685983a72/DTE2012-139563.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bd/3503321/743d5b0de2e6/DTE2012-139563.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Quality Assessment of EUS-FNA: A Single-Center Large Cohort of Biopsies.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检的准确性和质量评估:单中心大型活检队列研究
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:139563. doi: 10.1155/2012/139563. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
2
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.使用内镜超声和腹腔镜超声对上消化道癌患者进行治疗前评估。
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568.
3
Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.细针活检与细针抽吸在胰腺和腹部肿块诊断中的对比分析:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;16(8):1314-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.经内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检诊断胃肠道病变
Cancer. 2004 Jun 25;102(3):157-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20360.
5
Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.胰腺肿块大小与超声内镜引导下细针抽吸诊断率的关系。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Nov;56(11):3370-5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1782-z. Epub 2011 Jun 19.
6
EUS-FNA, ancillary studies and their clinical utility in patients with mediastinal, pancreatic, and other abdominal lesions.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术、辅助检查及其在纵隔、胰腺和其他腹部病变患者中的临床应用。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2020 Nov;48(11):1058-1066. doi: 10.1002/dc.24523. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
[Clinical utility of EUS-FNA in upper gastrointestinal and mediastinal disease].[超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检在上消化道及纵隔疾病中的临床应用价值]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Oct 15;129(42):2227-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-831867.
8
Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术与细针活检用于淋巴结诊断的大型多中心对比分析
Clin Endosc. 2020 Sep;53(5):600-610. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.170. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.现场细胞病理学评估及辅助检查对胰腺、纵隔、腹腔内和黏膜下病变的超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检有益。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Apr;43(4):278-86. doi: 10.1002/dc.23207. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
10
Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)细胞学评估中的累积和程序:学习曲线及超越敏感性和特异性的诊断性能
Cytopathology. 2007 Jun;18(3):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00433.x. Epub 2007 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural History of Asymptomatic Esophageal Subepithelial Tumors of 30 mm or Less in Size.大小为 30 毫米或以下的无症状食管黏膜下肿瘤的自然史。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;37(23):e184. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e184.
2
Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle.反向斜面与 Franseen 型超声内镜穿刺针的比较。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep 16;12(9):266-275. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i9.266.
3
EUS-guided FNA in Diagnosing Pancreatic Lesions: Strength and Cytological Spectrum.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检在胰腺病变诊断中的优势及细胞图谱

本文引用的文献

1
Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.内镜超声(EUS)引导下取样在胃肠病学中的适应证、结果和临床影响:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)临床指南。
Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):897-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256754. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)在诊断胰腺实性肿块中的作用。
Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:29-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01112.x.
3
J Cytol. 2019 Oct-Dec;36(4):189-195. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_5_18. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.如何在内镜超声检查中衡量质量。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jul;6(13):266. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.36.
5
Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.用于表征胰腺局灶性病变的成像方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2.
6
Impact of endoscopic ultrasound quality assessment on improving endoscopic ultrasound reports and procedures.内镜超声质量评估对改善内镜超声报告及操作的影响。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr 25;8(8):362-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i8.362.
7
Cell-block procedure in endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine-needle-aspiration of gastrointestinal solid neoplastic lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺胃肠道实性肿瘤病变的细胞块制作方法
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug 25;7(11):1014-22. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i11.1014.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic lesions.内镜超声引导下胰腺病变细针穿刺抽吸细胞学检查的诊断准确性
J Pathol Transl Med. 2015 Jan;49(1):52-60. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2014.10.26. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
9
Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: What needle is the best?内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术治疗实体病变的基本技术:哪种针最好?
Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Jan;3(1):46-53. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.124313.
10
Establishing a quality indicator format for endoscopic ultrasound.建立内镜超声质量指标格式。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov 16;5(11):574-80. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.574.
Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review.
EUS 引导下 FNA 相关发病率和死亡率的评估:一项系统综述。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.045.
4
Performance of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: impact on patient management and costs in low-volume EUS centers.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS-FNA)对纵隔淋巴结病变的诊断效能:对低通量 EUS 中心患者管理和成本的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2260-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0946-9. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles.使用25号和22号针进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸的前瞻性比较。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:546390. doi: 10.1155/2009/546390. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies.触诊引导与超声引导下甲状腺细针穿刺活检的成本效益比较
BMC Endocr Disord. 2009 May 16;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-9-14.
7
Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for undiagnosed intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对未确诊的腹腔内淋巴结病的应用价值。
J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(6):562-7. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0048-4. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
8
Emerging applications of endoscopic ultrasound in gastrointestinal cancers.内镜超声在胃肠道癌中的新兴应用。
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2008 Jul;2(4):198-202.
9
EUS-FNA and FDG-PET are complementary procedures in the diagnosis of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)和氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)在诊断纵隔淋巴结肿大方面是互补的检查方法。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2008 Apr-Jun;71(2):219-29.
10
Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography and physician specialty on the management of patients with esophagus cancer.内镜超声检查及医生专业对食管癌患者管理的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(3):241-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00766.x.