Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, SGM 418, 3620 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2013 Jan 10;117(1):153-63. doi: 10.1021/jp309778n. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
The nature and mechanism of phosphate hydrolysis reactions are of great interest in view of the crucial role of these reactions in key biological processes. Although it is becoming clearer that the ultimate way of resolving mechanistic controversies must involve reliable theoretical studies, it is not widely realized that such studies cannot be performed at present by using most existing automated ways and that only careful systematic studies can lead to meaningful conclusions. The present work clarifies the above point by considering the hydrolysis of phosphate monoesters. The clarification starts by defining the actual issues that should be addressed in careful studies and by highlighting the problems with studies that ignore the need for unique mechanistic definitions (e.g., works that confuse associative and dissociative pathways). We then focus on the analysis of the proton transfer (PT) pathways in phosphate hydrolysis and on recent suggestions that PT involves more than one water molecule. Here we point out that most of the studies that found a proton transfer through several water molecules have not involved a sufficient systematic search of the relevant reaction coordinates. This includes both energy minimization approaches as well as a recent metadynamics (MTD) simulation study. To illustrate the crucial need of exploring the potential surfaces reliably, rather than relying on automated approaches, we present here a very careful study of the free energy landscape along a 3D reaction coordinate (RC) exploring both the standard 2D RC, comprised of the attacking and leaving group reaction coordinates, as well as of the proton transfer (PT) coordinate. Our study points out that QM/MM minimization or MTD studies that concluded that the hydrolysis of phosphate monoesters involves a PT through several water molecules, have not explored carefully the single water (1W) path (that involves a direct PT form the attacking water molecule to the phosphate oxygen). Furthermore, we identified the most likely reason for the difficulty in finding the 1W path by QM/MM minimization methods, as well as by the current MTD simulations. We also discuss the problems with current studies that challenge the phosphate as a base mechanism and emphasize that all recent studies found associative/concerted paths (although many have not realized the meaning of their results). Finally, although we clearly do not have the last word about the 1W versus 2W paths we believe that we illustrated that the crucial mechanistic problems with alternative pathways should not be resolved by just running black box search approaches.
鉴于这些反应在关键生物过程中的关键作用,磷酸水解反应的性质和机制引起了极大的关注。尽管越来越清楚的是,解决机制争议的最终方法必须涉及可靠的理论研究,但人们并没有广泛认识到,目前大多数现有的自动化方法都无法进行此类研究,只有进行精心系统的研究才能得出有意义的结论。通过考虑磷酸单酯的水解,本工作澄清了上述观点。澄清工作首先定义了在仔细研究中应解决的实际问题,并强调了那些忽略了对独特机制定义的需求的研究的问题(例如,将缔合和离解途径混淆的工作)。然后,我们将重点放在分析磷酸水解中的质子转移(PT)途径上,并讨论了最近关于 PT 涉及多个水分子的建议。在这里,我们指出,大多数发现通过多个水分子进行质子转移的研究都没有对相关反应坐标进行足够系统的搜索。这包括能量最小化方法以及最近的元动力学(MTD)模拟研究。为了说明可靠地探索势能面而非依赖自动化方法的关键需求,我们在此展示了沿着 3D 反应坐标(RC)对自由能景观的非常仔细的研究,该 RC 同时探索了标准的 2D RC,包括进攻和离去基团反应坐标以及质子转移(PT)坐标。我们的研究表明,那些得出磷酸单酯的水解涉及通过多个水分子的 PT 的 QM/MM 最小化或 MTD 研究,并没有仔细探索单水分子(1W)途径(该途径涉及直接从进攻水分子到磷酸氧的 PT)。此外,我们确定了通过 QM/MM 最小化方法以及当前的 MTD 模拟找到 1W 路径的最可能原因。我们还讨论了当前挑战磷酸作为碱机制的研究存在的问题,并强调了所有最近的研究都发现了缔合/协同途径(尽管许多人没有意识到他们的研究结果的意义)。最后,尽管我们对 1W 与 2W 途径的问题没有最终定论,但我们相信,我们已经说明了不应该通过运行黑盒搜索方法来解决替代途径的关键机制问题。