Centre for Food Policy, City University London, School of Arts and Social Sciences, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.
Appetite. 2013 Mar;62:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
This article sets out the findings from research on the impact of a, UK based, chefs in schools teaching programme on food, health, nutrition and cookery. Professional chefs link with local schools, where they deliver up to three sessions to one class over a year. The research measured the impact of a standardised intervention package and changes in food preparation and consumption as well as measuring cooking confidence. The target group was 9-11year olds in four schools. The main data collection method was a questionnaire delivered 2weeks before the intervention and 2weeks afterwards. There was a group of four matched control schools. Those taking part in the intervention were enthused and engaged by the sessions and the impact measures indicated an intention to change. There were gains in skills and confidence to prepare and ask for the ingredients to be purchased for use in the home. Following the session with the chef, the average reported cooking confidence score increased from 3.09 to 3.35 (by 0.26 points) in the intervention group - a statistically significant improvement. In the control group this change was not statistically significant. Children's average reported vegetable consumption increased after the session with the chef, with the consumption score increasing from 2.24 to 2.46 points (0.22 points) again, a statistically significant increase with no significant changes in the control group. The research highlights the need to incorporate evaluation into school cooking initiatives as the findings can provide valuable information necessary to fine-tune interventions and to ensure consistency of the healthy eating messages.
本文阐述了一项在英国开展的“厨师进校园”教学计划对食品、健康、营养和烹饪教育影响的研究结果。专业厨师与当地学校合作,在一学年内向一个班级提供多达三次的课程。该研究衡量了标准化干预方案的影响,以及食物准备和消费方式的变化,并测量了烹饪信心。研究对象是四所学校的 9-11 岁儿童。主要的数据收集方法是在干预前两周和干预后两周向学生发放问卷。同时还有四所匹配的对照组学校。参与干预的学生对课程非常热情和投入,干预措施的衡量指标表明他们有意改变。学生在准备和要求购买家庭用食材方面的技能和信心都有所提高。在与厨师进行课程后,干预组学生的平均烹饪信心评分从 3.09 分提高到 3.35 分(提高了 0.26 分),这是一个具有统计学意义的显著提高。而对照组的这一变化则没有统计学意义。在与厨师进行课程后,儿童的平均蔬菜摄入量有所增加,摄入量评分从 2.24 分提高到 2.46 分(提高了 0.22 分),这也是一个具有统计学意义的显著增加,而对照组则没有显著变化。该研究强调了在学校烹饪计划中纳入评估的必要性,因为研究结果可以提供必要的有价值信息,以微调干预措施,并确保健康饮食信息的一致性。