Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 15;67:227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.029. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
The effectiveness of placebo treatments depends on the recipient's expectations, which are at least in part shaped by previous experiences. Thus, positive past experience together with an accordant verbal instruction should enhance outcome expectations and subsequently lead to higher placebo efficacy. This should be reflected in subjective valuation reports and in activation of placebo-related brain structures. We tested this hypothesis in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, where subjects experienced different levels of pain relief and conforming information about price levels for two placebo treatments during a manipulation phase, thereby establishing a weak and a strong placebo. As expected, both placebos led to a significant pain relief and the strong placebo induced better analgesic efficacy. Individual placebo value estimates reflected treatment efficacy, i.e. subjects were willing to pay more money for the strong placebo even though pain stimulation was completed at this time. On the neural level, placebo effects were associated with activation of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, the anterior insula, and the ventral striatum and deactivations in the thalamus and secondary somatosensory cortex. However, only placebo-related responses in rostral anterior cingulate cortex were consistent across both the anticipation of painful stimuli and their actual administration. Most importantly, rostral anterior cingulate cortex responses were higher for the strong placebo, thus mirroring the behavioral effects. These results directly link placebo analgesia to anticipatory activity in the ventral striatum, a region involved in reward processing, and highlight the role of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, as its activity consistently scaled with increasing analgesic efficacy.
安慰剂治疗的效果取决于接受者的期望,而期望至少部分受到先前经验的影响。因此,积极的过往经验和一致的口头指令应该会增强结果期望,从而导致更高的安慰剂疗效。这应该反映在主观评估报告和与安慰剂相关的大脑结构的激活中。我们在一项功能磁共振成像研究中检验了这一假设,在该研究中,受试者在一个操作阶段经历了两种不同程度的安慰剂治疗和关于价格水平的一致信息,从而建立了弱和强两种安慰剂。正如预期的那样,两种安慰剂都能显著缓解疼痛,而强安慰剂能诱导更好的镇痛效果。个体的安慰剂价值估计反映了治疗效果,即即使此时疼痛刺激已经完成,受试者也愿意为强安慰剂支付更多的钱。在神经水平上,安慰剂效应与额前扣带皮质的前部、前岛叶和腹侧纹状体的激活以及丘脑和次级体感皮层的去激活有关。然而,只有额前扣带皮质的安慰剂相关反应在对疼痛刺激的预期和实际给药时是一致的。最重要的是,强安慰剂的额前扣带皮质反应更高,因此反映了行为效应。这些结果直接将安慰剂镇痛与腹侧纹状体的预期活动联系起来,腹侧纹状体是一个涉及奖励处理的区域,并突出了额前扣带皮质的作用,因为其活动随着镇痛效果的增强而一致地扩大。