• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

员工安全是否会影响客户满意度?来自电力行业的证据。

Does employee safety influence customer satisfaction? Evidence from the electric utility industry.

机构信息

University of Central Oklahoma, 100 N. University Drive, Edmond, OK 73034, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2012 Dec;43(5-6):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2012.10.003
PMID:23206512
Abstract

PROBLEM

Research on workplace safety has not examined implications for business performance outcomes such as customer satisfaction.

METHOD

In a U.S. electric utility company, we surveyed 821 employees in 20 work groups, and also had access to archival safety data and the results of a customer satisfaction survey (n=341).

RESULTS

In geographically-based work units where there were more employee injuries (based on archival records), customers were less satisfied with the service they received. Safety climate, mediated by safety citizenship behaviors (SCBs), added to the predictive power of the group-level model, but these two constructs exerted their influence independently from actual injuries. In combination, two safety-related predictor paths (injuries and climate/SCB) explained 53% of the variance in customer satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

Results offer preliminary evidence that workplace safety influences customer satisfaction, suggesting that there are likely spillover effects between the safety environment and the service environment. Additional research will be needed to assess the specific mechanisms that convert employee injuries into palpable results for customers.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

Better safety climate and reductions in employee injuries have the potential to offer payoffs in terms of what customers experience.

摘要

问题

关于工作场所安全的研究尚未考察其对业务绩效结果(如客户满意度)的影响。

方法

在美国一家电力公司中,我们调查了 20 个工作小组中的 821 名员工,并且还可以访问档案安全数据和客户满意度调查的结果(n=341)。

结果

在基于地理位置的工作单位中,员工受伤(根据档案记录)的次数更多,客户对他们所获得的服务的满意度越低。安全氛围通过安全公民行为(SCB)起到中介作用,增加了群体水平模型的预测能力,但这两个构念的影响是独立于实际伤害的。这两个与安全相关的预测路径(伤害和气候/SCB)共同解释了客户满意度 53%的方差。

讨论

结果初步提供了工作场所安全影响客户满意度的证据,表明安全环境和服务环境之间可能存在溢出效应。需要进一步的研究来评估将员工受伤转化为客户实际感受的具体机制。

对行业的影响

更好的安全氛围和减少员工受伤有可能在客户体验方面带来回报。

相似文献

1
Does employee safety influence customer satisfaction? Evidence from the electric utility industry.员工安全是否会影响客户满意度?来自电力行业的证据。
J Safety Res. 2012 Dec;43(5-6):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
2
Effects of service provider attitudes and employment status on citizenship behaviors and customers' attitudes and loyalty behavior.服务提供者态度和就业状况对公民行为以及顾客态度和忠诚行为的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):365-378. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.365.
3
Employee retention: a customer service approach.员工保留:一种客户服务方法。
Radiol Manage. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):16-23.
4
The neglected role of collective customer perceptions in shaping collective employee satisfaction, service climate, voluntary turnover, and involuntary turnover: A cautionary note.忽视顾客整体感知在塑造员工整体满意度、服务氛围、自愿离职和非自愿离职方面的作用:一个警示。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Nov;105(11):1327-1337. doi: 10.1037/apl0000480. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Service employees give as they get: internal service as a moderator of the service climate-service outcomes link.服务员工给予的同时也在收获:内部服务作为服务氛围-服务结果关系的调节变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar;96(2):423-31. doi: 10.1037/a0022071.
6
Making stronger causal inferences: Accounting for selection bias in associations between high performance work systems, leadership, and employee and customer satisfaction.做出更强有力的因果推断:在高绩效工作系统、领导、员工和客户满意度之间的关联中,考虑选择偏差的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Sep;103(9):1001-1018. doi: 10.1037/apl0000315. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Employee customer orientation in manufacturing organizations: joint influences of customer proximity and the senior leadership team.制造型组织中的员工顾客导向:顾客接近度与高级领导团队的共同影响
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):317-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.317.
8
Buffering the negative effects of employee surface acting: the moderating role of employee-customer relationship strength and personalized services.缓冲员工表面行为的负面影响:员工-客户关系强度和个性化服务的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):341-50. doi: 10.1037/a0034428. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate.将组织资源与工作投入与员工绩效及客户忠诚度相联系:服务氛围的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1217-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.
10
Fostering employee service creativity: Joint effects of customer empowering behaviors and supervisory empowering leadership.激发员工服务创造力:授权型顾客行为与督导授权领导的共同影响
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1364-1380. doi: 10.1037/a0038969. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria in Supply Chain Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估新冠疫情期间供应链管理中的最佳供应商选择标准
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;12:804954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804954. eCollection 2021.