Suppr超能文献

[访谈技巧对儿童目击证人报告及随后对所观事件记忆的影响]

[Effect of interview techniques on children's eyewitness reports and subsequent memories of a viewed event].

作者信息

Naka Makiko

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan.

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2012 Oct;83(4):303-13. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.83.303.

Abstract

We investigated how different ways of interviewing, i.e., free recall (FR), free recall with context reinstatement (CR), asking misleading questions (Q), or interviewing with open-ended questions (O) affect children's eyewitness reports and their subsequent memory of a viewed event. Participants were 249 eight and ten year-old children. Children were shown a video, and then were interviewed using either FR, CR, Q, or O, followed by an immediate recognition test, and a delayed recall and recognition tests several days later about the event. Results showed that O interviews elicited a greater amount of accurate information than FR, CR, and Q interviews. For older children, CR interviews elicited more accurate information than FR and Q interviews without eliciting inaccurate information. However, for younger children, the subsequent recognition memory for the event was more accurate for children who were interviewed using FR and O. These results suggest that O is the most effective way of conducting investigative interviews with children not only to elicit accurate information but also to keep their memories relatively intact.

摘要

我们研究了不同的访谈方式,即自由回忆(FR)、情境恢复自由回忆(CR)、提出误导性问题(Q)或采用开放式问题访谈(O)如何影响儿童的目击证人报告以及他们随后对所观看事件的记忆。参与者为249名8岁和10岁的儿童。向儿童展示一段视频,然后分别采用FR、CR、Q或O方式进行访谈,随后进行即时识别测试,几天后对该事件进行延迟回忆和识别测试。结果表明,与FR、CR和Q访谈相比,O访谈能引出更多准确信息。对于年龄较大的儿童,CR访谈比FR和Q访谈能引出更准确的信息,且不会引出不准确信息。然而,对于年龄较小的儿童,采用FR和O方式访谈的儿童对该事件的后续识别记忆更准确。这些结果表明,O是对儿童进行调查性访谈的最有效方式,不仅能引出准确信息,还能使他们的记忆相对完整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验