Stolzenberg Stacia N, McWilliams Kelly, Lyon Thomas D
Arizona State University.
John Jay School of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Aug;24(3):379-392. doi: 10.1037/law0000176. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
Children's memories for their conversations are commonly explored in child abuse cases. In two studies, we examined conversational recall in 154 4- to 9-year-old children's reports of an interaction with a stranger, some of whom were complicit in a transgression and were admonished to keep it a secret. Immediately afterwards, all children were interviewed about their interaction. One week later, children were asked recall questions about their interaction with the stranger, their conversations with the stranger, and their conversations with the interviewer. Overall, interaction recall questions elicited few details about children's conversations, whereas conversation recall questions were effective in doing so. Accuracy was high in response to both the interaction and conversation recall questions, with no differences observed. Questions explicitly inquiring about coaching elicited higher error rates, as well as apparent attempts to maintain secrecy. Source errors were rare. Conversation recall questions elicited new transgression disclosures among a substantial percentage of children. The results provide tentative support for the use of recall questions in eliciting conversational information from children.
在虐待儿童案件中,儿童对其对话的记忆常被探讨。在两项研究中,我们考察了154名4至9岁儿童在与陌生人互动报告中的对话回忆情况,其中一些陌生人参与了违规行为,并被告诫要对此保密。之后,立即对所有儿童进行了关于他们互动情况的访谈。一周后,询问儿童关于他们与陌生人互动、与陌生人对话以及与访谈者对话的回忆问题。总体而言,互动回忆问题引出的儿童对话细节很少,而对话回忆问题在这方面很有效。对互动和对话回忆问题的回答准确性都很高,未观察到差异。明确询问引导情况的问题错误率更高,同时还有明显的保密尝试。来源错误很少见。对话回忆问题在相当比例的儿童中引出了新的违规行为披露。这些结果为使用回忆问题从儿童那里获取对话信息提供了初步支持。