Fugazzi Russell W, Fransson Boel A, Curran Katie M, Davis Howard M, Gay John M
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6610, USA.
Vet Surg. 2013 Feb;42(2):198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01076.x. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
To (1) evaluate biomechanical strength of 4 different laparoscopic knots using 2 suture types, and (2) evaluate carotid artery ligature bursting pressure of 2 knots using a single suture type.
Biomechanical materials testing.
Suture material (3-0 polydioxanone, 3-0 polyglactin 910).
Four knot types were tested: 4S-modified Roeder (4SMR) Weston plus 3 square throws (W3S); Weston plus 3 granny throws (W3G); and a 4 square throw knot as a control (control); 24 specimens of each knot type were tied with 3-0 polyglactin 910 and 24 of 3 knot types (4SMR, W3S, control) were tied with 3-0 polydioxanone. Suture loop constructs were tested to 3 mm displacement failure and ultimate failure. Carotid artery ligation bursting pressure was tested using 10 samples each of 4SMR and W3S knots with 3-0 polyglactin 910.
The W3S, W3G, and controls were similar. The 4SMR was similar to W3S using 3-0 PDS but the 4SMR had lower load to failure and greater elongation than the Weston using 3-0 polyglactin 910. The 4SMR had a higher slippage rate with 3-0 polyglactin 910. All ligatures withstood supraphysiologic pressures.
Surgeons using 3-0 polyglactin 910 should consider using the Weston knot with added throws during laparoscopic procedures.
(1)使用两种缝线类型评估4种不同腹腔镜结的生物力学强度,以及(2)使用单一缝线类型评估2种结的颈动脉结扎破裂压力。
生物力学材料测试。
缝线材料(3-0聚二氧杂环己酮,3-0聚乙醇酸910)。
测试4种结类型:4S改良罗德结(4SMR)、韦斯顿结加3个方结(W3S);韦斯顿结加3个奶奶结(W3G);以及作为对照的4个方结(对照);每种结类型的24个标本用3-0聚乙醇酸910打结,3种结类型(4SMR、W3S、对照)的24个标本用3-0聚二氧杂环己酮打结。缝线环结构测试至3毫米位移失败和最终失败。使用4SMR和W3S结各10个样本,均采用3-0聚乙醇酸910测试颈动脉结扎破裂压力。
W3S、W3G和对照相似。使用3-0聚二氧杂环己酮时,4SMR与W3S相似,但使用3-0聚乙醇酸910时,4SMR的破坏载荷低于韦斯顿结,伸长率更高。4SMR使用3-0聚乙醇酸910时的滑动率更高。所有结扎均能承受超生理压力。
使用3-0聚乙醇酸910的外科医生在腹腔镜手术中应考虑使用增加结数的韦斯顿结。