Centre for Research in Autism and Education, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, London, UK.
J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):29-46. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000086.
Children's assignment of novel words to nameless objects, over objects whose names they know (mutual exclusivity; ME) has been described as a driving force for vocabulary acquisition. Despite their ability to use ME to fast-map words (Preissler & Carey, 2005), children with autism show impaired language acquisition. We aimed to address this puzzle by building on studies showing that correct referent selection using ME does not lead to word learning unless ostensive feedback is provided on the child's object choice (Horst & Samuelson, 2008). We found that although toddlers aged 2;0 at risk for autism can use ME to choose the correct referent of a word, they do not benefit from feedback for long-term retention of the word-object mapping. Further, their difficulty using feedback is associated with their smaller receptive vocabularies. We propose that difficulties learning from social feedback, not lexical principles, limits vocabulary building during development in children at risk for autism.
儿童将新单词分配给没有名字的物体,而不是他们知道名字的物体(互斥性;ME),这被描述为词汇习得的驱动力。尽管他们能够使用 ME 进行快速映射单词(Preissler 和 Carey,2005),但自闭症儿童的语言习得能力受损。我们旨在通过以下研究来解决这个难题:这些研究表明,除非在儿童的物体选择上提供明示反馈,否则使用 ME 进行正确的参照选择不会导致词汇学习(Horst 和 Samuelson,2008)。我们发现,尽管有自闭症风险的 2 岁儿童可以使用 ME 选择单词的正确参照,但他们不会从反馈中受益于单词-物体映射的长期保留。此外,他们在使用反馈方面的困难与他们较小的接受词汇量有关。我们提出,在自闭症风险儿童的发展过程中,从社会反馈中学习的困难而不是词汇原则限制了词汇的构建。