Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.031. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) urologic procedures have gained significant interest worldwide in an attempt to further reduce morbidity and minimize scarring associated with conventional laparoscopic surgery. The robotic technology has overcome some of the limitations of manual single-incision surgery relating to lack of triangulation, instrument collision, and surgical exposure. There are no data on robotic LESS partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors >4 cm.
To evaluate the feasibility of robotic LESS PN for renal tumors >4 cm.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 67 consecutive patients who underwent robotic LESS PN were collected between May 2009 to January 2011.
Patients were stratified into two groups: 20 patients with renal tumors >4 cm (group 1) and 47 patients with renal tumors ≤ 4 cm (group 2). Perioperative data were recorded and comparisons between the two groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables.
No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in demographic information, operative complications, pathologic characteristics, mean decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, estimated blood loss, operative times, conversion rate, or positive surgical margins. However, group 1 had a higher mean nephrometry score (p<0.01), longer warm ischemia time (p = 0.007), and longer length of stay (p = 0.046). Its retrospective design and being conducted at a single center were the main limitations of this study.
This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic LESS PN for tumors >4 cm. Patients with tumors >4 cm had a statistically significant, higher mean nephrometry score, longer warm ischemia time, and longer length of stay, but there was no increased risk of adverse outcomes. A long-term study is needed to confirm the durable renal preservation and oncologic outcomes for patients with larger tumor burden.
腹腔镜单部位(LESS)泌尿科手术在全球范围内引起了极大的兴趣,试图进一步降低与传统腹腔镜手术相关的发病率和最小化疤痕。机器人技术克服了与手动单切口手术相关的一些限制,包括缺乏三角测量、器械碰撞和手术暴露。目前尚无关于机器人 LESS 部分肾切除术(PN)治疗>4cm 肾肿瘤的资料。
评估机器人 LESS PN 治疗>4cm 肾肿瘤的可行性。
设计、地点和参与者:收集了 2009 年 5 月至 2011 年 1 月期间接受机器人 LESS PN 的 67 例连续患者的数据。
患者分为两组:20 例肾肿瘤>4cm(组 1)和 47 例肾肿瘤≤4cm(组 2)。记录围手术期数据,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较两组间连续变量,使用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量。
两组在人口统计学信息、手术并发症、病理特征、估计肾小球滤过率的平均下降、估计失血量、手术时间、转换率或阳性手术切缘方面无统计学差异。然而,组 1 的平均肾切除术评分较高(p<0.01),热缺血时间较长(p=0.007),住院时间较长(p=0.046)。其回顾性设计和单中心进行是本研究的主要局限性。
本研究证明了机器人 LESS PN 治疗>4cm 肿瘤的可行性和安全性。肿瘤>4cm 的患者具有统计学上显著更高的平均肾切除术评分、更长的热缺血时间和更长的住院时间,但不良结局的风险没有增加。需要进行长期研究来确认对肿瘤负荷较大的患者的持久肾功能保护和肿瘤学结果。