Suppr超能文献

轴流左心室辅助装置植入后的再入院率。

Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;61(2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.041. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence and causes of readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

BACKGROUND

Based on the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) study experience, readmissions after LVAD implantation are thought to be frequent.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed admissions to our facility in a cohort of 115 patients implanted between January 2008 and July 2011 with the HeartMate II axial flow LVAD, of whom 42 were bridged to transplant. To account for repeated events, Andersen-Gill models were used to determine possible predictors.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for 1.4 ± 0.9 years. There were 224 readmissions in 83 patients. The overall readmission rate was 1.64 ± 1.97 per patient-year of follow-up. The readmission rate for the first 6 months was 2.0 ± 2.3 and decreased to 1.2 ± 2.1 during subsequent follow-up. Leading causes were bleeding (66 readmissions in 34 patients), mostly gastrointestinal bleed (51 in 27 patients), cardiac (51 in 36 patients, most for HF or arrhythmia), infections (32 in 25 patients) of which 6 were pump related, and thrombosis (20 in 15 patients) including 13 readmissions due to hemolysis. Preoperative variables associated with (fewer) readmissions in a multivariate model include residence within our hospital-extended referral zone of Minnesota and the neighboring states (hazard ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 0.91; p = 0.011), hemoglobin (hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.99; p = 0.027) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.0 per 1,000-unit increase, p = 0.022). C-statistic for the model: 0.63.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission rates after axial flow LVAD implantation decrease during the first 6 months and then stabilize. The leading causes are bleeding, cardiac (heart failure and arrhythmia), infections, and thrombosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定植入轴流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后的再入院发生情况和原因。

背景

根据 REMATCH(机械辅助治疗充血性心力衰竭的随机评估)研究经验,LVAD 植入后的再入院被认为是频繁的。

方法

我们对 2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月期间在我们机构植入 HeartMate II 轴流 LVAD 的 115 例患者的入院情况进行了回顾性分析,其中 42 例患者为桥接移植。为了考虑到重复事件,我们使用 Andersen-Gill 模型来确定可能的预测因素。

结果

患者平均随访 1.4±0.9 年。83 名患者中有 224 例再入院。总的再入院率为每患者-年随访 1.64±1.97。前 6 个月的再入院率为 2.0±2.3,随后随访降至 1.2±2.1。主要原因是出血(34 名患者中有 66 例),主要是胃肠道出血(27 名患者中有 51 例),心脏(36 名患者中有 51 例,大多数是心力衰竭或心律失常),感染(25 名患者中有 32 例),其中 6 例与泵有关,血栓(15 名患者中有 20 例),包括 13 例因溶血引起的再入院。多变量模型中与(较少)再入院相关的术前变量包括居住在明尼苏达州和相邻州的我院扩展转诊区(危险比:0.66;95%置信区间:0.48 至 0.91;p=0.011)、血红蛋白(危险比:0.91,95%置信区间:0.84 至 0.99;p=0.027)和 N 端前 B 型利钠肽(危险比:0.98;95%置信区间:每增加 1,000 单位增加 0.96 至 1.0,p=0.022)。模型的 C 统计量为 0.63。

结论

轴流 LVAD 植入后的再入院率在前 6 个月内下降,然后稳定。主要原因是出血、心脏(心力衰竭和心律失常)、感染和血栓形成。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验